Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation
Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Pages 1021-1025.
Abstract
The ASPIC+ framework is intermediate in abstraction between Dung's argumentation framework and concrete instantiating logics. This paper generalises ASPIC+ to accommodate classical logic instantiations, and adopts a new proposal for evaluating extensions: attacks are used to define the notion of conflict-free sets, while the defeats obtained by applying preferences to attacks, are exclusively used to determine the acceptability of arguments. Key properties and rationality postulates are then shown to hold for the new framework.
@inproceedings{ijcai2011p175,
title = {Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation},
author = {Modgil, Sanjay and Prakken, Henry},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-11}},
publisher = {AAAI Press/International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence},
editor = {Toby Walsh},
pages = {1021--1025},
year = {2011},
month = {7},
doi = {10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation AU - Modgil, Sanjay AU - Prakken, Henry T2 - Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-11 PB - AAAI Press/International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence PY - 2011 SP - 1021 EP - 1025 DO - 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175 UR - https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents: