---
title: "Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation"
authors:
  - "Sanjay Modgil"
  - "Henry Prakken"
doi: "10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175"
url: "https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2011/175"
pdf: "https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2011/0175.pdf"
venue: "Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence"
year: 2011
pages: "1021-1025"
track: ""
keywords:
---

# Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation

Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken

*Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence*, pages 1021-1025. DOI: [10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175](https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175)

## Abstract

The ASPIC+ framework is intermediate in abstraction between Dung's argumentation framework and concrete instantiating logics. This paper generalises ASPIC+ to accommodate classical logic instantiations, and adopts a new proposal for evaluating extensions: attacks are used to define the notion of conflict-free sets, while the defeats obtained by applying preferences to attacks, are exclusively used to determine the acceptability of arguments. Key properties and rationality postulates are then shown to hold for the new framework.