On the Relation between Argumentation and Non-monotonic Coherence-Based Entailment
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Non-monotonic Reasoning. Pages 1443-1447.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to discuss and compare two types of methods for reasoning with inconsistent belief bases : coherence-based approaches to non-monotonic entailment, based on the selection and management of consistent subbases, and argumentation systems, based on the construction and selection of arguments in favor of a conclusion. We present several argumentation systems, then we show that most of the associated inference relations can be also defined using wellknown principles for selecting consistent subbases. So we establish a formal correspondence between the so-called argumentation paradigm and recent work on non-monotonic entailment. Lastly, we propose several directions for further research concerning the integration of preference relations into argumentation systems.
@inproceedings{ijcai1995p186,
title = {On the Relation between Argumentation and Non-monotonic Coherence-Based Entailment},
author = {Cayrol, Claudette},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-95}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence},
editor = {Chris S. Mellish},
pages = {1443--1447},
year = {1995},
note = {Non-monotonic Reasoning},
url = {https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1995/186},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - On the Relation between Argumentation and Non-monotonic Coherence-Based Entailment AU - Cayrol, Claudette T2 - Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-95 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence PY - 1995 SP - 1443 EP - 1447 UR - https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1995/186 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents:
