Proceedings

Diversity of Extensions in Abstract Argumentation

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 3846-3854.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/428

Abstract

Argumentation is an important topic of AI for modeling and reasoning about arguments. In abstract argumentation, we consider directed graphs, so-called argumentation frameworks (AF), that express conflicts between arguments. The semantics is defined

by the notion of extensions, which are sets of arguments that satisfy particular relationship conditions in the AF. Usually, standard reasoning in argumentation do not reveal how far apart extensions are.

We introduce a quantitative notion of diversity of extensions based on the symmetric-difference and provide a systematic complexity classification. Intuitively, diversity captures whether extensions of a framework (accepted viewpoints) differ only marginally or represent fundamentally incompatible sets of arguments. We study whether an AF admits k-diverse extensions, admits k-diverse extensions covering specific arguments, and to compute the largest k for which an AF admits k-diverse extensions. We outline a prototype and provide an evaluation for computing diversity levels.

Johannes K. Fichte, Markus Hecher, Yasir Mahmood, and Zhengjun Wang. 2026. Diversity of Extensions in Abstract Argumentation. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-26. IJCAI, 3846–3854. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/428
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards