Proceedings

Ranking Extensions in Abstract Argumentation

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 2047-2053.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/282

Abstract

Extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation provide a criterion to determine whether a set of arguments is acceptable or not. In this paper, we present the notion of extension-ranking semantics, which determines a preordering over sets of arguments, where one set is deemed more plausible than another if it is somehow more acceptable. We obtain extension-based semantics as a special case of this new approach, but it also allows us to make more fine-grained distinctions, such as one set being "more complete'' or "more admissible'' than another. We define a number of general principles to classify extension-ranking semantics and develop concrete approaches. We also study the relation between extension-ranking semantics and argument-ranking based semantics, which rank individual arguments instead of sets of arguments.

Kenneth Skiba, Tjitze Rienstra, Matthias Thimm, Jesse Heyninck, and Gabriele Kern-Isberner. 2021. Ranking Extensions in Abstract Argumentation. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21. IJCAI, 2047–2053. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/282
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards