Proceedings

Decomposition-Guided Reductions for Argumentation and Treewidth

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 1880-1886.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/259

Abstract

Argumentation is a widely applied framework for modeling and evaluating arguments and its reasoning with various applications. Popular frameworks are abstract argumentation (Dung’s framework) or logic-based argumentation (Besnard-Hunter’s framework). Their computational complexity has been studied quite in-depth. Incorporating treewidth into the complexity analysis is particularly interesting, as solvers oftentimes employ SAT-based solvers, which can solve instances of low treewidth fast. In this paper, we address whether one can design reductions from argumentation problems to SAT-problems while linearly preserving the treewidth, which results in decomposition-guided (DG) reductions. It turns out that the linear treewidth overhead caused by our DG reductions, cannot be significantly improved under reasonable assumptions. Finally, we consider logic-based argumentation and establish new upper bounds using DG reductions and lower bounds.

Johannes Fichte, Markus Hecher, Yasir Mahmood, and Arne Meier. 2021. Decomposition-Guided Reductions for Argumentation and Treewidth. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21. IJCAI, 1880–1886. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/259
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards