A Critical Look at Critics in HTN Planning
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Planning. Pages 1592-1597.
Abstract
Detecting interactions and resolving conflicts is one of the key issues for generative planning systems. Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning systems use critics for this purpose. Critics have provided extra efficiency and flexibility to HTN planning systems, but their procedural -and sometimes domain-specificnature has not been amenable to analytical studies. As a result, little work is available on the correctness or efficiency of critics . This paper describes a principled approach to handling conflicts, as implemented in UMCP 1 , an HTN planning system. Critics in UMCP have desirable properties such as systematicity, and the preservation of soundness and completeness.
@inproceedings{ijcai1995p205,
title = {A Critical Look at Critics in HTN Planning},
author = {Erol, Kutluhan and Hendler, James A. and Nau, Dana S. and Tsuneto, Reiko},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-95}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence},
editor = {Chris S. Mellish},
pages = {1592--1597},
year = {1995},
note = {Planning},
url = {https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1995/205},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - A Critical Look at Critics in HTN Planning AU - Erol, Kutluhan AU - Hendler, James A. AU - Nau, Dana S. AU - Tsuneto, Reiko T2 - Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-95 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence PY - 1995 SP - 1592 EP - 1597 UR - https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1995/205 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents:
