Proceedings

Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Domain Assignments

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 2076-2082.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/286

Abstract

Argumentative discourse rarely consists of opinions whose claims apply universally. As with logical statements, an argument applies to specific objects in the universe or relations among them, and may have exceptions. In this paper, we propose

an argumentation formalism that allows associating arguments with a domain of application. Appropriate semantics are given, which formalise the notion of partial argument acceptance, i.e. the set of objects or relations that an argument can be applied

to. We show that our proposal is in fact equivalent to the standard Argumentation Frameworks of Dung, but allows a more intuitive and compact expression of some core concepts of commonsense and non-monotonic reasoning, such as the scope of an argument, exceptions, relevance and others.

Alexandros Vassiliades, Theodore Patkos, Giorgos Flouris, Antonis Bikakis, Nick Bassiliades, and Dimitris Plexousakis. 2021. Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Domain Assignments. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21. IJCAI, 2076–2082. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/286
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards