Proceedings

A Quantum-inspired Entropic Kernel for Multiple Financial Time Series Analysis

Video Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Special Track on AI in FinTech. Pages 4453-4460.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/614

Abstract

Network representations are powerful tools for the analysis of time-varying financial complex systems consisting of multiple co-evolving financial time series, e.g., stock prices, etc. In this work, we develop a new kernel-based similarity measure between dynamic time-varying financial networks. Our ideas is to transform each original financial network into quantum-based entropy time series and compute the similarity measure based on the classical dynamic time warping framework associated with the entropy time series. The proposed method bridges the gap between graph kernels and the classical dynamic time warping framework for multiple financial time series analysis. Experiments on time-varying networks abstracted from financial time series of New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) database demonstrate that our approach can effectively discriminate the abrupt structural changes in terms of the extreme financial events.

  1. [Bai and Hancock, 2014] Lu Bai and Edwin R. Hancock. Depth-based complexity traces of graphs. Pattern Recog- nition, 47(3):1172-1186, 2014.
  2. [Bai et al., 2014] Lu Bai, Luca Rossi, Horst Bunke, and Ed- win R. Hancock. Attributed graph kernels using the jensen-tsallis q-differences. In Proceedings of ECML- PKDD, pages 99-114, 2014.
  3. [Bai et al., 2015a] Lu Bai, Luca Rossi, Andrea Torsello, and Edwin R. Hancock. A quantum jensen-shannon graph kernel for unattributed graphs. Pattern Recognition, 48(2):344-355, 2015.
  4. [Bai et al., 2015b] Lu Bai, Zhihong Zhang, Chaoyan Wang, Xiao Bai, and Edwin R. Hancock. A graph kernel based on the jensen-shannon representation alignment. In Pro- ceedings of IJCAI, pages 3322-3328, 2015. IJCAI
  5. [Bai et al., 2016] Lu Bai, Luca Rossi, Lixin Cui, and Ed- win R. Hancock. A novel entropy-based graph signature from the average mixing matrix. In Proceedings of ICPR, pages 1339-1344, 2016.
  6. [Bai et al., 2018] Lu Bai, Lixin Cui, Luca Rossi, Lixiang Xu, Xiao Bai, and Edwin Hancock. Local-global nested graph kernels using nested complexity traces. Pattern Recogni- tion Letters, 2018.
  7. [Bai et al., 2020] Lu Bai, Luca Rossi, Lixin Cui, Jian Cheng, and Edwin R. Hancock. A quantum-inspired similari- ty measure for the analysis of complete weighted graphs. IEEE Trans. Cybern., 50(3):1264-1277, 2020.
  8. [Borgwardt and Kriegel, 2005] Karsten M. Borgwardt and Hans-Peter Kriegel. Shortest-path kernels on graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Da- ta Mining, pages 74-81, 2005.
  9. [Bullmore and Sporns, 2009] Ed Bullmore and Olaf Sporn- s. Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuro- science, 10(3):186-198, 2009.
  10. [Cui et al., 2018] Lixin Cui, Lu Bai, Luca Rossi, Zhihong Zhang, Yuhang Jiao, and Edwin R. Hancock. A prelim- inary survey of analyzing dynamic time-varying financial networks using graph kernels. In Proceedings of S+SSPR, pages 237-247, 2018.
  11. [Cuturi, 2011] Marco Cuturi. Fast global alignment kernels. In Proceedings of ICML, pages 929-936, 2011.
  12. [Farhi and Gutmann, 1998] E. Farhi and S. Gutmann. Quan- tum computation and decision trees. Physical Review A, 58:915, 1998.
  13. [Godsil, 2013] Chris Godsil. Average mixing of continuous quantum walks. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 120(7):1649-1662, 2013.
  14. [Haussler, 1999] David Haussler. Convolution kernels on discrete structures. In Technical Report UCS-CRL-99-10, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 1999.
  15. [Jain, 2019] Brijnesh J. Jain. Making the dynamic time warping distance warping-invariant. Pattern Recognition, 94:35-52, 2019.
  16. [Johansson et al., 2014] Fredrik D. Johansson, Vinay Jetha- va, Devdatt P. Dubhashi, and Chiranjib Bhattacharyya. Global graph kernels using geometric embeddings. In Pro- ceedings of ICML, pages 694-702, 2014.
  17. [Kashima et al., 2003] Hisashi Kashima, Koji Tsuda, and Akihiro Inokuchi. Marginalized kernels between labeled graphs. In Proceedings of ICML, pages 321-328, 2003.
  18. [Mikalsen et al., 2018] Karl Øyvind Mikalsen, Filippo Mari- a Bianchi, Cristina Soguero-Ruíz, and Robert Jenssen. Time series cluster kernel for learning similarities between multivariate time series with missing data. Pattern Recog- nition, 76:569-581, 2018.
  19. [Nicolis et al., 2005] G. Nicolis, A. G. Cantu, and C. Nicolis. Dynamical aspects of interaction networks. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 15:3467, 2005.
  20. [Shervashidze et al., 2009] N. Shervashidze, S.V.N. Vish- wanathan, K. Mehlhorn T. Petri, and K. M. Borgwardt. Ef- ficient graphlet kernels for large graph comparison. Jour- nal of Machine Learning Research, 5:488-495, 2009.
  21. [Shimada et al., 2008] Y. Shimada, T. Kimura, and T. Ikeguchi. Analysis of chaotic dynamics using measures of the complex network theory. In Proceedings of ICANN, pages 61-70, 2008.
  22. [Silva et al., 2015] Filipi N. Silva, Cesar H. Comin, Thomas K. Peron, Francisco A. Rodrigues, Cheng Ye, Richard C. Wilson, Edwin R. Hancock, and Luciano da F. Costa. Modular dynamics of financial market networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.05040, 2015.
  23. [Witten et al., 2011] Ian H. Witten, Eibe Frank, and Mark A. Hall. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2011.
  24. [Xu et al., 2018] Lixiang Xu, Xiaoyi Jiang, Lu Bai, Jin Xiao, and Bin Luo. A hybrid reproducing graph kernel based on information entropy. Pattern Recognition, 73:89-98, 2018.
  25. [Ye et al., 2015] Cheng Ye, César H. Comin, Thomas K. Peron, Filipi N. Silva, Francisco A. Rodrigues, Luciano da F. Costa, Andrea Torsello, and Edwin R. Hancock. Thermodynamic characterization of networks using graph polynomials. Physical Review E, 92(3):032810, 2015.
  26. [Zhang and Small, 2006] J. Zhang and M. Small. Complex network from pseudoperiodic time series: Topology ver- sus dynamics. Physical Review Letters, 96:238701, 2006.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards