Proceedings

SAGE: A Hybrid Geopolitical Event Forecasting System

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Demos. Pages 6557-6559.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/955

Abstract

Forecasting of geopolitical events is a notoriously difficult task, with experts failing to significantly outperform a random baseline across many types of forecasting events. One successful way to increase the performance of forecasting tasks is to turn to crowdsourcing: leveraging many forecasts from non-expert users. Simultaneously, advances in machine learning have led to models that can produce reasonable, although not perfect, forecasts for many tasks. Recent efforts have shown that forecasts can be further improved by ``hybridizing'' human forecasters: pairing them with the machine models in an effort to combine the unique advantages of both. In this demonstration, we present Synergistic Anticipation of Geopolitical Events (SAGE), a platform for human/computer interaction that facilitates human reasoning with machine models.

  1. [Brier, 1950] Glenn W Brier. Verification of forecasts ex- pressed in terms of probability. Monthey Weather Review, 78(1):1-3, 1950.
  2. [Camerer and Johnson, 1997] Colin F Camerer and Eric J Johnson. The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: How can experts know so much and predict so badly. Research on judgment and decision making: Cur- rents, connections, and controversies, 342, 1997.
  3. [Gerner et al., 2002] Deborah J Gerner, Philip A Schrodt, Omur Yilmaz, and Rajaa Abu-Jabr. The creation of cameo (conflict and mediation event observations): An event data framework for a post cold war world. In annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, volume 29, 2002.
  4. [Mellers et al., 2014] Barbara Mellers, Lyle Ungar, Jonathan Baron, Jaime Ramos, Burcu Gurcay, Katrina Fincher, Syd- ney E. Scott, Don Moore, Pavel Atanasov, Samuel A. Swift, Terry Murray, Eric Stone, and Philip E. Tetlock. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical fore- casting tournament. Psychological Science, 25(5):1106- 1115, 2014. PMID: 24659192.
  5. [Tetlock, 2017] Philip E Tetlock. Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton University Press, 2017.
  6. [Ward et al., 2012] Michael D Ward, Nils W Metternich, Christopher Carrington, Cassy Dorff, Max Gallop, Flo- rian M Hollenbach, Anna Schultz, and Simon Weschle. Geographical models of crises: Evidence from icews. Ad- vances in Design for Cross-Cultural Activities, 429, 2012.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards