Proceedings

Tracking Political Elections on Social Media: Applications and Experience

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 2320-2325.

© 2015 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

In recent times, social media has become a popular medium for many election campaigns. It not only allows candidates to reach out to a large section of the electorate, it is also a potent medium for people to express their opinion on the proposed policies and promises of candidates. Analyzing social media data is challenging as the text can be noisy, sparse and even multilingual. In addition, the information may not be completely trustworthy, particularly in the presence of propaganda, promotions and rumors. In this paper we describe our work for analyzing election campaigns using social media data. Using data from the 2012 US presidential elections and the 2013 Philippines General elections, we provide detailed experiments on our methods that use granger causality to identify topics that were most “causal” for public opinion and which in turn, give an interpretable insight into “elections topics” that were most important. Our system was deployed by the largest media organization in the Philippines during the 2013 General elections and using our work, the media house able to identify and report news stories much faster than competitors and reported higher TRP ratings during the election.

  1. [Agrawal et al., 1993] Rakesh Agrawal, Tomasz Imieliński, and Arun Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD '93, pages 207-216, New York, NY, USA, 1993. ACM.
  2. [Bhatt et al., 2010] Rushi Bhatt, Vineet Chaoji, and Rajesh Parekh. Predicting product adoption in large-scale social networks. In Proceedings of ACM international confer- ence on Information and knowledge management, pages 1039-1048, 2010.
  3. [Bollen et al., 2011] Johan Bollen, Huina Mao, and Xiao- Jun Zeng. Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1):1-8, 2011.
  4. [Bothos et al., 2010] Efthimios Bothos, Dimitris Apostolou, and Gregoris Mentzas. Using social media to predict fu- ture events with agent-based markets. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(6):50-58, 2010.
  5. [Chung and Mustafaraj, 2011] Jessica Elan Chung and Eni Mustafaraj. Can collective sentiment expressed on twit- ter predict political elections? In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011.
  6. [Contractor and Faruquie, 2013] Danish Contractor and Tan- veer Afzal Faruquie. Understanding election candidate approval ratings using social media data. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion, pages 189-190. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2013.
  7. [Finn et al., 2014] S Finn, PT Metaxas, E Mustafaraj, M OKeefe, L Tang, S Tang, and L Zeng. Trails: A sys- tem for monitoring the propagation of rumors on twitter. Computation and Journalism Symposium, NYC, NY, 2014.
  8. [Gayo-Avello et al., 2011] Daniel Gayo-Avello, Panagio- tis T. Metaxas, and Eni Mustafaraj. Limits of Electoral Predictions Using Twitter. In International AAAI Confer- ence on Weblogs and Social Media (posters), July 2011.
  9. [Gayo-Avello, 2012] Daniel Gayo-Avello. I wanted to pre- dict elections with twitter and all i got was this lousy pa- per -a balanced survey on election prediction using twitter data. 2012.
  10. [Granger, 1969] C. W. J. Granger. Investigating Causal Rela- tions by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3):424-438, August 1969.
  11. [Jungherr et al., 2012] A. Jungherr, P. Jürgens, and H. Schoen. Why the pirate party won the german election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: A re- sponse to tumasjan, a., sprenger, to, sander, pg, & welpe, im predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2):229-234, 2012.
  12. [Krishnamurthy et al., 2009] Rajasekar Krishnamurthy, Yunyao Li, Sriram Raghavan, Frederick Reiss, Shivaku- mar Vaithyanathan, and Huaiyu Zhu. Systemt: A system for declarative information extraction. SIGMOD Rec., 37(4):7-13, March 2009.
  13. [O'Connor et al., 2010] Brendan O'Connor, Ramnath Bala- subramanyan, Bryan R. Routledge, and Noah A. Smith. From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2010.
  14. [Osborne and Dredze, 2014] Miles Osborne and Mark Dredze. Facebook, twitter and google plus for breaking news: Is there a winner? In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2014.
  15. [Petrovic et al., 2013] Sasa Petrovic, Miles Osborne, Richard McCreadie, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. Can twitter replace newswire for breaking news? 2013.
  16. [Rill et al., 2014] Sven Rill, Dirk Reinel, Jörg Scheidt, and Roberto V. Zicari. Politwi: Early detection of emerging political topics on twitter and the impact on concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowl.-Based Syst., 69:24-33, 2014.
  17. [Sadilek et al., 2012] A. Sadilek, H. Kautz, and V. Silenzio. Predicting disease transmission from geo-tagged micro- blog data. In Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
  18. [Sang and Bos, 2012] Erik Tjong Kim Sang and Johan Bos. Predicting the 2011 dutch senate election results with twit- ter. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Analysis in Social Media, 2012.
  19. [Tumasjan et al., 2010] A. Tumasjan, T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe. Predicting elections with twit- ter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Confer- ence on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 178-185, 2010.
  20. [William and Gulati, 2008] C William and G Gulati. What is a social network with facebook and vote share in the 2008 presidential primaries. In Annual Meeting of American Po- litical Science Association, 2008.
  21. [Wolf et al., 2009] Timo Wolf, Adrian Schroter, Daniela Damian, and Thanh Nguyen. Predicting build failures us- ing social network analysis on developer communication. In Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering, 2009.
  22. [Xie et al., 2014] Runquan Xie, Feida Zhu, Hui Ma, Wei Xie, and Chen Lin. Clear: A real-time online observa- tory for bursty and viral events. Proc. VLDB Endow., 7(13):1637-1640, August 2014.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards