A Comparison of Analytic and Experimental Goal Regression for Machine Learning
Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Learning and Acquisition. Pages 555-558.
Abstract
Recent research demonstrates the use of goal regression as an analytic technique for learning search heuristics . This paper critically examines this research and identifies essential applicability conditions for the technique. Th e conditions that operators be invertible and that the domain be closed with respect to the inverse operators se v e~ely limit the use of analytic goal regression. In those re s tncted domains which satisfy the applicability conditions, analytic goal regression only discovers required preconditions for operator application. Discovering pragmatic preconditions is beyond the capability of the technique. An alternative, called experimental goal regression, is defined wh ic h approximates the results of analytic goal regression without suffering from these limitations.
@inproceedings{ijcai1985p106,
title = {A Comparison of Analytic and Experimental Goal Regression for Machine Learning},
author = {Porter, Bruce W. and Kibler, Dennis F.},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-85}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence},
editor = {Aravind Joshi},
pages = {555--558},
year = {1985},
note = {Learning and Acquisition},
url = {https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1985/106},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - A Comparison of Analytic and Experimental Goal Regression for Machine Learning AU - Porter, Bruce W. AU - Kibler, Dennis F. T2 - Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-85 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence PY - 1985 SP - 555 EP - 558 UR - https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1985/106 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents: