Proceedings

Computer Simulation of Articulatory Activity in Speech Production

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Physiological Modeling. Pages 447-470.

© 1969 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

A computer facility for modeling sound production resulting from exciting a moving articulatory system is described. The vocal tract is treated as an acoustic transmission line with variable crosssectional area. The system allows on-line specification of the history of articulatory states (vocal-tract shapes) and excitation parameters, and generates the resultant acoustic signal for immediate evaluation by the experimenter. Novel features include graphical as well as numeric al control of articulatory configurations, time-motion display of articulatory data and resonant-frequency versus time displays for the resulting acoustic signal . The facility is used for the study of the dynamics of articulatory movement and for speech synthesis .

  1. Holmes, J. N., Mattingly, I. G. and Shearme, J. N., "Speech Synthesis by Rule 4 " Language and Speech, 7, 127 (196 ). -
  2. Rabiner, L. R., "Speech Synthesis b~ Rule: An Acoustic Domain Approach, ' Bell System Tech. Journal 47, 17 (1968). -
  3. Lindblom, B., "Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction," J . Acoust. Soc. Am., 35, 1773, (1963).
  4. Henke, W., "Dynamic Articulatory Model for Speech Production Using Computer Simulation," Ph.D. Thesis, Mass. Inst. of Tech., Cambridge, Mass., 1966.
  5. Schroeder, M. R., "Determina tion of the Geometry of the Human Voc a l Tracts by Acoustic Me a surements," J . Acoust. Soc. Am ., 41, 1002 (1967 ) .
  6. Dunn, H. K., "The Ca lculation of Vowel Resonances and an Electrical Vocal Tract," J. Acoust . Soc . Am., 22, 740 (1950).
  7. Stevens . . K. N., Kasowski, S. and Fant, C. G. M., "An Electric Analog of the Vocal Tract," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 25, 734 (1953 ) .
  8. Fant, C. G. M., Speech Communication Research, Ing. Veitenshaps Akad., (Stockholm), 24, 331 (1953)
  9. Rosen, G., "Dynamic Analog Speech Synthesizer," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 30, 20 (1953).
  10. Hecker, M. H. L., "Studies of Nasal Consonants With an Articulatory Speech Synthesizer," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34, 179 (1962).
  11. ll. Kadokawa, Y. and Nakata, K., "Analy- sis of Speech by Vocal-Tract Configu- ration," J. Radio Res. Laboratories, Japan, ll, 99 (1964) .
  12. Coker, C. H., "Speech Synthesis with a Parametric Articulatory Model," paper A-4, Speech Symposium, Kyoto, Japan, 1968.
  13. Kelly, J. L., Jr. and Lochbaum, C. C., "Speech Synthesis," Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Acoustics, Copenhagen, 1962.
  14. Mermelstein, P., "Determination of the Vocal-Tract Shape from Measured Formant Frequencies," J. Acoust . Soc. Am., 41 , 1283 (1967).
  15. Flanagan, J. L. and Landgraf, L. L., "Self-Oscillating Source for Vocal- Tract Synthesizers," Trans. IEEE AU-16, 57-64 (1968). References
  16. Shlaer, S.: "The relation between visual acuity and illumination"; J. Gen. Physio. ~. 165-188 (1937).
  17. Beurle, R.L., Daniels, M.V. & Hill, B.L.: "Visual pattern detection"; I.E.E. conference on Pattern Recognition, Publication 42, published 1968• by the Institution of Electrical Engineers (Great Britain).
  18. Rose, A.: "The relative sensitivities of the television pick-up tubes, photo- graphic film and the human eye"; Proc. Inst. Radio Engineers, 30, 293-300 (1942).
  19. Rose, A.: "The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale"; J. Op. Sco. Am., 38, 196-208 (1948).
  20. Blackwell, H.R.: "The effects of certain psychological variables upon target detectability. Eng. Res. Inst. Report 2455-12-F. University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Michigan) (1958).
  21. Fry, G.A.: Physiological irradiation across the retina, J. Op. Soc. Am., 55, 108-111 (1965).
  22. Campbell, F.W. & Robson, J.G.: "Application of Fourier analysis to visibility of gratings"; J. Physiol. 197, 551-566 (1968).
  23. Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N.: "Integrative action in the eat's lateral geniculate body"; J. Physiol. 155, 385-398 (1961).
  24. Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N.: "Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the eat's visual cortex"; J. Physiol. 160, 106-154 (1962).
  25. Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N.: "Receptive fields and functional architecture in two non-striate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat"; J. Neurophysiol. 28, 229-289 (1965). a. 9.
  26. "The effect of recognition". same authors. on Artificial noise on visual pattern A companion paper by the International Conference Intelli gence, 1969.
  27. Graham, C. H. & Kemp, E.H.: "Brightness dis- crimination as a function of the duration of the increment in intensity"; J. Gen. Physiol., 21, 635-650 (1938).
  28. Graham, C. H. & Margaria, R.: "Area and intensity-time relationship in the peripheral retina"; Am. J. Physiol. 113, 299-305 (1935).
  29. Barlow, H. B.: "Temporal and spatial su:nrnation in human vision at different background intensities"; J. Physiol. 141, 337-350 (1958). ~7.5 3f1.8 3 2.. 9 33 . 0 29.1 25.0
  30. 5 Values of r 111 , Lm• TE and O:p used i n the calculation of theoretical curves from Equations (4) and (5). Luminance measm:-st\ in millilamherts and vi.sual angle i.n minutes of arc. Large Medium Small -5.50 -4.81 -3.98 -5.50 -4.85 -3.52
  31. Pattern Large Bars Large Fan Large C Large Discs Large Square Large Line Medium Bars Medium Fan Medium C Medium Discs Ql -5.48 -5 . 38 -4 . 46 -5.19 -4.95 -4.56 -4.85 -4.71 -3.79 -4.54 Medium Square -4.51 Medium Line -4.
  32. Small Bars Small Fan Small C Small Discs Small Square Small Line -3.52 -3.52 -2.77 -3.41 -3.96 -3.22 Background Luminance (2) (3) (4) -5.07 -4.62 -4.16 -4.96 -4.50 -4 . 02 -4 . 36 -3.91 -3.53 -4 . 80 -4.24 -3.65 -4.57 -3.97 -3.45 -4.38 -3.89 -3.46 -4.59 -4.18 -3.78 -4.31 -4.06 -3.75 -3 . 47 -~.34 -3.08 -4.33 -3.84 -3-38 -4.ll -3.65 -3.14 -3 . 91 -3.63 -3.14 -3.44 -3.42 -3.27 -3.56 -3.39 . -3.23 -2.65 -2.79 -2.63 -3.46 -3 . 20 -2.89 -3.57 -2.95 -2.59 -3 . 13 -2 . 90 -2.60 (5) (6) (7) -3.50 -2 . 79 -1.90 -3.39 -2 .77 -1.85 -2.88 -2.27 -1.39 -3.03 -2 .4 5 -1.52 -2.82 -2.35 -1.40 -2.96 -2.43 -1.64 -3 . 16 -2 . 74 -1.81 -3.12 -2 . 67 -1.81 -2.73 -2.27 -1.37 -2 . 90 -2.36 -1.44 -2.62 -2.17 -1.34 -2.68 -2.19 -1.41 -2.92 -2.52 -1.67 -2.89 -2.49 -1.68 -2.30 -1.96 -1.17 -2 . 62 -2.15 -1.32 -2.19 -1.79 -1.04 -2.33 -1.86 -1.
  33. Table II Increment thresholds, ~IR, in Log (mL), for resolution of the six patterns, Table III Comparison of predi cted and measured absolute thresholds , in log (mL), for resolution of the parallel bar gratings. Background luminances (mL): (1) zero; (2) 7.4 x 10-6 ; (3) 1.2 X 10-4; (4) 9.4 X 10-4; (5) 1.5 X 10-2 ; (6) 1.5 X 10-l; (7) 2 . 5.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards