Proceedings

Enhancing Urban Flow Maps via Neural ODEs

Video Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main track. Pages 1295-1302.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/180

Abstract

Flow super-resolution (FSR) enables inferring fine-grained urban flows with coarse-grained observations and plays an important role in traffic monitoring and prediction. The existing FSR solutions rely on deep CNN models (e.g., ResNet) for learning spatial correlation, incurring excessive memory cost and numerous parameter updates. We propose to tackle the urban flows inference using dynamic systems paradigm and present a new method FODE -- FSR with Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs). FODE extends neural ODEs by introducing an affine coupling layer to overcome the problem of numerically unstable gradient computation, which allows more accurate and efficient spatial correlation estimation, without extra memory cost. In addition, FODE provides a flexible balance between flow inference accuracy and computational efficiency. A FODE-based augmented normalization mechanism is further introduced to constrain the flow distribution with the influence of external factors. Experimental evaluations on two real-world datasets demonstrate that FODE significantly outperforms several baseline approaches.

  1. [Ascher et al., 1997] Uri M Ascher, Steven J Ruuth, and Raymond J Spiteri. Implicit-explicit runge-kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 25(2-3):151-167, 1997.
  2. [Ba et al., 2016] Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Ge- offrey E Hinton. Layer normalization. arXiv: 1607.06450, 2016.
  3. [Butcher and Wanner, 1996] John Charles Butcher and Ger- hard Wanner. Runge-kutta methods: some historical notes. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 22(1-3):113-151, 1996.
  4. [Cai et al., 2019] Jianrui Cai, Shuhang Gu, Radu Timofte, Lei Zhang, and et al. Ntire 2019 challenge on real image super-resolution -methods and results. In CVPR Chal- lenge, pages 2211-2223, 2019.
  5. [Chen et al., 2018] Tian Qi Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David K Duvenaud. Neural ordinary dif- ferential equations. In NeuIPS, pages 6572-6583, 2018.
  6. [De Brouwer et al., 2019] Edward De Brouwer, Jaak Simm, Adam Arany, and Yves Moreau. Gru-ode-bayes -contin- uous modeling of sporadically-observed time series. In NeurIPS, pages 7377-7388, 2019.
  7. [Dinh et al., 2015] Laurent Dinh, David Krueger, and Yoshua Bengio. NICE: non-linear independent compo- nents estimation. In ICLR, 2015.
  8. [Dinh et al., 2017] Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio. Density estimation using real NVP. In ICLR, 2017.
  9. [Dong et al., 2015] Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. TPAMI, 38(2):295-307, 2015.
  10. [E, 2017] Weinan E. A proposal on machine learning via dynamical systems. Communications in Mathematics and Statistics, 5(1):1-11, 2017.
  11. [Gholami et al., 2019] Amir Gholami, Kurt Keutzer, and George Biros. Anode: Unconditionally accurate memory- efficient gradients for neural odes. In IJCAI, pages 730- 736, 2019.
  12. [Grathwohl et al., 2019] Will Grathwohl, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Jesse Bettencourt, Ilya Sutskever, and David Duvenaud. FFJORD: free-form continuous dynamics for scalable re- versible generative models. In ICLR, 2019.
  13. [He et al., 2016] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recog- nition. In CVPR, pages 770-778, 2016.
  14. [He et al., 2019] Xiangyu He, Zitao Mo, Peisong Wang, Yang Liu, Mingyuan Yang, and Jian Cheng. Ode-inspired network design for single image super-resolution. In CVPR, pages 1732-1741, 2019.
  15. [Heinonen and Lähdesmäki, 2019] Markus Heinonen and Harri Lähdesmäki. ODE 2 VAE: Deep Generative Second Order ODEs with Bayesian Neural Networks. In NeurIPS, pages 13412-13421, 2019.
  16. [Kim et al., 2016] Jiwon Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks. In CVPR, pages 1646-1654, 2016.
  17. [Kingma and Ba, 2014] Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv: 1412.6980, 2014.
  18. [Kingma and Dhariwal, 2018] Durk P Kingma and Prafulla Dhariwal. Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 con- volutions. In NIPS, pages 10236-10245, 2018.
  19. [Ledig et al., 2017] Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Huszár, Caballero, and et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. In CVPR, pages 105-114, 2017.
  20. [Liang et al., 2019] Yuxuan Liang, Kun Ouyang, Lin Jing, Sijie Ruan, Ye Liu, Junbo Zhang, David S Rosenblum, and Yu Zheng. Urbanfm: Inferring fine-grained urban flows. In KDD, pages 3132-3142, 2019.
  21. [Liu et al., 2019a] Ning Liu, Rui Ma, Yue Wang, and Lin Zhang. Inferring fine-grained air pollution map via a spa- tiotemporal super-resolution scheme. In UbiqComp, pages 498-504, 2019.
  22. [Liu et al., 2019b] Xuanqing Liu, Tesi Xiao, Si Si, Qin Cao, Sanjiv Kumar, and Cho-Jui Hsieh. Neural SDE: Stabi- lizing neural ode networks with stochastic noise. arXiv: 1906.02355v1, 2019.
  23. [Lu et al., 2018] Yiping Lu, Aoxiao Zhong, Quanzheng Li, and Bin Dong. Beyond finite layer neural networks: Bridg- ing deep architectures and numerical differential equa- tions. In ICML, pages 3282-3291, 2018.
  24. [Poli et al., 2019] Michael Poli, Stefano Massaroli, Jun- young Park, Atsushi Yamashita, Hajime Asama, and Jinkyoo Park. Graph neural ordinary differential equa- tions. arXiv: 1911.07532v1, 2019.
  25. [Rubanova et al., 2019] Yulia Rubanova, Ricky T.Q. Chen, and David Duvenaud. Latent ordinary differential equa- tions for irregularly-sampled time series. In NeurIPS, pages 5321-5331, 2019.
  26. [Shi et al., 2016] Wenzhe Shi, Jose Caballero, Ferenc Huszár, Johannes Totz, Andrew P Aitken, Rob Bishop, Daniel Rueckert, and Zehan Wang. Real-time single im- age and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network. In CVPR, pages 1874- 1883, 2016.
  27. [Wang et al., 2019] Zhihao Wang, Jian Chen, and Steven CH Hoi. Deep learning for image super-resolution: A survey. arXiv:1902.06068, 2019.
  28. [Zhang et al., 2017] Junbo Zhang, Yu Zheng, and Dekang Qi. Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction. In AAAI, pages 1655-1661, 2017.
  29. [Zhang et al., 2018] Yulun Zhang, Yapeng Tian, Yu Kong, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Residual dense network for image super-resolution. In CVPR, pages 2472-2481, 2018.
  30. [Zhang et al., 2019] Tianjun Zhang, Zhewei Yao, Amir Gho- lami, Kurt Keutzer, Joseph Gonzalez, George Biros, and Michael Mahoney. Anodev2: A coupled neural ode evolu- tion framework. In NeurIPS, 2019.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards