---
title: "A Resource-Aware Taxonomy of AI Bias Mitigation Techniques"
authors:
  - "Daniela Loreti"
  - "Roberta Calegari"
  - "Michela Milano"
doi: "10.24963/ijcai.2026/882"
url: "https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2026/882"
pdf: "https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2026/0882.pdf"
venue: "Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence"
year: 2026
pages: "7949-7957"
track: "Survey Track"
keywords:
  - "AI Ethics, Trust, Fairnes: Ethical, legal and societal issues"
  - "AI Ethics, Trust, Fairnes: Trustworthy AI"
  - "AI Ethics, Trust, Fairnes: Fairness and diversity"
  - "AI Ethics, Trust, Fairnes: Bias"
---

# A Resource-Aware Taxonomy of AI Bias Mitigation Techniques

Daniela Loreti, Roberta Calegari, Michela Milano

*Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence*, pages 7949-7957. DOI: [10.24963/ijcai.2026/882](https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/882)

## Abstract

The literature on AI fairness has grown rapidly, proposing a large number of bias mitigation techniques that are commonly organized into pre-, in-, and post-processing methods. This pipeline-centric view offers an operational, lifecycle-based perspective on where mitigation can be applied. In deployment settings, however, practitioners also face an additional question: whether a mitigation family is applicable given the resources and access rights available in a concrete system.
In this survey, we use resources broadly to denote data access/control, training capability, and deployment-time interface/decision control.
Accordingly, we introduce a resource-aware taxonomy that complements existing taxonomies by classifying AI bias mitigation methods according to the conditions that make them practically implementable. We use this taxonomy to structure and reinterpret existing literature on the topic, highlighting which mitigation families remain feasible under resource constraints.