Proceedings

Bounding Acceptability Degrees and Eliciting Initial Weights in Gradual Argumentation

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 3979-3987.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/443

Abstract

Many semantics for abstract weighted argumentation assume that each argument is associated with a numerical initial weight. Eliciting these initial weights poses several challenges: (1) accurately providing a specific numerical value is often difficult, and (2) individuals frequently confuse initial weights with acceptability degrees in the presence of other arguments. We therefore propose an elicitation pipeline that allows a user to specify their believed final acceptability degree intervals for each argument. We can determine which portion (if any) of these intervals are rational, refining the intervals, or restoring rationality when the intervals are irrational. This allows us to ultimately identify possible initial weights for each argument.

Nir Oren, and Bruno Yun. 2026. Bounding Acceptability Degrees and Eliciting Initial Weights in Gradual Argumentation. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-26. IJCAI, 3979–3987. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/443
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards