Proceedings

Bridging Feature-structural Homophily and Long-range Heterogeneity for Self-supervised Heterogeneous Graph Learning

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 2519-2527.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/280

© 2026 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Self-supervised heterogeneous graph learning has achieved promising results in diverse applications but still faces two issues: (i) existing methods focus on either feature similarity or meta-path to capture homophily, neglecting their inherent complementarity; (ii) existing methods rely on meta-paths to capture interactions among same-type nodes, which may introduce noise and inherently exclude long-range cross-type interactions. To address these issues, we first propose a self-expressive solver that captures the complementary homophily between meta-paths and node features to obtain homophilous representations. Meanwhile, we design separate path encoders to model diverse interactions, thus explicitly including cross-type interactions while mitigating noise via adaptive fusion. Theoretical analysis verifies that homophilous representations exhibit a high-order grouping effect to capture complementary homophily, while path encoders possess adaptive smoothness capabilities to filter noise. Extensive experiments on diverse datasets, including a large-scale dataset, demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method.

  1. [Chapelle et al., 2002] Olivier Chapelle, Jason Weston, and Bernhard Schölkopf. Cluster kernels for semi-supervised learning. In NeurIPS, volume 15, 2002.
  2. [Cover and Hart, 1967] T. Cover and P. Hart. Nearest neigh- bor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Informa- tion Theory, 13(1):21-27, 1967.
  3. [Dong et al., 2017] Yuxiao Dong, Nitesh V. Chawla, and Ananthram Swami. metapath2vec: Scalable representa- tion learning for heterogeneous networks. In SIGKDD, page 135-144, 2017.
  4. [Gu et al., 2025] Ming Gu, Zhuonan Zheng, Sheng Zhou, Meihan Liu, Jiawei Chen, Qiaoyu Tan, Liangcheng Li, and Jiajun Bu. Making classic gnns strong baselines across varying homophily: A smoothness-generalization perspective. In NeurIPS, 2025.
  5. [He et al., 2019] Li He, Nilanjan Ray, Yisheng Guan, and Hong Zhang. Fast large-scale spectral clustering via ex- plicit feature mapping. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 49(3):1058-1071, 2019.
  6. [Hu et al., 2019] Binbin Hu, Yuan Fang, and Chuan Shi. Ad- versarial learning on heterogeneous information networks. In SIGKDD, pages 120-129, 2019.
  7. [Hu et al., 2020] Ziniu Hu, Yuxiao Dong, Kuansan Wang, and Yizhou Sun. Heterogeneous graph transformer. In WWW, pages 2704-2710, 2020.
  8. [Huang et al., 2025a] Yudi Huang, Ci Nie, Hongqing He, Yujie Mo, Yonghua Zhu, Guoqiu Wen, and Xiaofeng Zhu. Multiplex graph representation learning with homophily and consistency. In AAAI, volume 39, pages 11835-11842, 2025.
  9. [Huang et al., 2025b] Zhirong Huang, Debo Cheng, Lin Liu, Jiuyong Li, Guangquan Lu, and Shichao Zhang. Interaction-data-guided conditional instrumental variables for debiasing recommender systems. In IJCAI, pages 2955-2963, 2025. IJCAI
  10. [Huang et al., 2025c] Zhirong Huang, Shichao Zhang, Debo Cheng, Jiuyong Li, Lin Liu, Guangquan Lu, and Guix- ian Zhang. Learning instrumental variable representation for debiasing in recommender systems. Neural Networks, page 107977, 2025.
  11. [Jing et al., 2021] Baoyu Jing, Chanyoung Park, and Hang- hang Tong. Hdmi: High-order deep multiplex infomax. In WWW, pages 2414-2424, 2021.
  12. [Kipf and Welling, 2017] Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In ICLR, 2017.
  13. [Li et al., 2020] Xiang Li, Ben Kao, Caihua Shan, Dawei Yin, and Martin Ester. Cast: a correlation-based adap- tive spectral clustering algorithm on multi-scale data. In SIGKDD, pages 439-449, 2020.
  14. [Li et al., 2024] Chao Li, Zijie Guo, Kun He, et al. Long- range meta-path search on large-scale heterogeneous graphs. In NeurIPS, volume 37, pages 44240-44268, 2024.
  15. [Liu et al., 2022] Nian Liu, Xiao Wang, Deyu Bo, Chuan Shi, and Jian Pei. Revisiting graph contrastive learning from the perspective of graph spectrum. In NeurIPS, vol- ume 35, pages 2972-2983, 2022.
  16. [Lu et al., 2019] Yuanfu Lu, Chuan Shi, Linmei Hu, and Zhiyuan Liu. Relation structure-aware heterogeneous in- formation network embedding. In AAAI, volume 33, pages 4456-4463, 2019.
  17. [Lv et al., 2021] Qingsong Lv, Ming Ding, Qiang Liu, Yuxi- ang Chen, Wenzheng Feng, Siming He, Chang Zhou, Jian- guo Jiang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. Are we really mak- ing much progress? revisiting, benchmarking and refining heterogeneous graph neural networks. In SIGKDD, pages 1150-1160, 2021.
  18. [Ma et al., 2025] Yunjie Ma, Fei Wang, Qiyu Feng, Zuocheng Wang, and Luyu Xie. HeMDAP: Hetero- geneous Graph Self-Supervised Learning for MiRNA- Disease Association Prediction . IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 22(02):769- 780, 2025.
  19. [Mavromatis and Karypis, 2021] Costas Mavromatis and George Karypis. Graph infoclust: Maximizing coarse- grain mutual information in graphs. In PAKDD, pages 541-553, 2021.
  20. [Mo et al., 2022] Yujie Mo, Liang Peng, Jie Xu, Xiaoshuang Shi, and Xiaofeng Zhu. Simple unsupervised graph repre- sentation learning. In AAAI, volume 36, pages 7797-7805, 2022.
  21. [Mo et al., 2023a] Yujie Mo, Yajie Lei, Jialie Shen, Xi- aoshuang Shi, Heng Tao Shen, and Xiaofeng Zhu. Disen- tangled multiplex graph representation learning. In ICML, pages 24983-25005, 2023.
  22. [Mo et al., 2023b] Yujie Mo, Zongqian Wu, Yuhuan Chen, Xiaoshuang Shi, Heng Tao Shen, and Xiaofeng Zhu. Mul- tiplex graph representation learning via common and pri- vate information mining. In AAAI, volume 37, pages 9217-9225, 2023.
  23. [Mo et al., 2024a] Yujie Mo, Zhihe Lu, Runpeng Yu, Xi- aofeng Zhu, and Xinchao Wang. Revisiting self- supervised heterogeneous graph learning from spectral clustering perspective. In NeurIPS, volume 37, pages 43133-43163, 2024.
  24. [Mo et al., 2024b] Yujie Mo, Feiping Nie, Ping Hu, Heng Tao Shen, Zheng Zhang, Xinchao Wang, and Xi- aofeng Zhu. Self-supervised heterogeneous graph learn- ing: a homophily and heterogeneity view. In ICLR, 2024.
  25. [Park et al., 2020] Chanyoung Park, Donghyun Kim, Jiawei Han, and Hwanjo Yu. Unsupervised attributed multiplex network embedding. In AAAI, volume 34, pages 5371- 5378, 2020.
  26. [Perozzi et al., 2014] Bryan Perozzi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Steven Skiena. Deepwalk: Online learning of social rep- resentations. In SIGKDD, pages 701-710, 2014.
  27. [Shen and Kang, 2025] Zhixiang Shen and Zhao Kang. When heterophily meets heterogeneous graphs: Latent graphs guided unsupervised representation learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2025.
  28. [Tian et al., 2023] Yijun Tian, Kaiwen Dong, Chunhui Zhang, Chuxu Zhang, and Nitesh V Chawla. Heteroge- neous graph masked autoencoders. In AAAI, volume 37, pages 9997-10005, 2023.
  29. [Veličković et al., 2019] Petar Veličković, William Fedus, William L. Hamilton, Pietro Liò, Yoshua Bengio, and R Devon Hjelm. Deep Graph Infomax. In ICLR, 2019.
  30. [Veličković et al., 2018] Petar Veličković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Liò, and Yoshua Bengio. Graph attention networks. In ICLR, 2018.
  31. [Wang et al., 2019] Xiao Wang, Houye Ji, Chuan Shi, Bai Wang, Yanfang Ye, Peng Cui, and Philip S Yu. Hetero- geneous graph attention network. In WWW, pages 2022- 2032, 2019.
  32. [Wang et al., 2020] Kuansan Wang, Zhihong Shen, Chiyuan Huang, Chieh-Han Wu, Yuxiao Dong, and Anshul Kanakia. Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1):396-413, 2020.
  33. [Wang et al., 2021] Xiao Wang, Nian Liu, Hui Han, and Chuan Shi. Self-supervised heterogeneous graph neural network with co-contrastive learning. In SIGKDD, pages 1726-1736, 2021.
  34. [Wang et al., 2023] Zehong Wang, Qi Li, Donghua Yu, Xi- aolong Han, Xiao-Zhi Gao, and Shigen Shen. Hetero- geneous graph contrastive multi-view learning. In SDM, pages 136-144, 2023.
  35. [Wang et al., 2025] Xin Wang, Liang Peng, Rongyao Hu, Ping Hu, and Xiaofeng Zhu. Unsupervised multiplex graph representation learning via maximizing coding rate reduction. Pattern Recognition, 165:111557, 2025.
  36. [Xie et al., 2025] Xuanting Xie, Bingheng Li, Erlin Pan, Zhao Kang, and Wenyu Chen. Aggregation-aware mlp: An unsupervised approach for graph message-passing. ArXiv, abs/2507.20127, 2025.
  37. [Yang et al., 2023] Xiaocheng Yang, Mingyu Yan, Shirui Pan, Xiaochun Ye, and Dongrui Fan. Simple and efficient heterogeneous graph neural network. In AAAI, volume 37, pages 10816-10824, 2023.
  38. [Yu and Gao, 2022] Zhaoning Yu and Hongyang Gao. Molecular representation learning via heterogeneous mo- tif graph neural networks. In ICML, pages 25581-25594, 2022.
  39. [Zhou et al., 2003] Dengyong Zhou, Olivier Bousquet, Thomas Lal, Jason Weston, and Bernhard Schölkopf. Learning with local and global consistency. In NeurIPS, volume 16, 2003.
  40. [Zhu et al., 2021] Yanqiao Zhu, Yichen Xu, Feng Yu, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, and Liang Wang. Graph contrastive learning with adaptive augmentation. In WWW, pages 2069-2080, 2021.
  41. [Zhu et al., 2022] Yanqiao Zhu, Yichen Xu, Hejie Cui, Carl Yang, Qiang Liu, and Shu Wu. Structure-enhanced hetero- geneous graph contrastive learning. In SDM, pages 82-90. SIAM, 2022.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards