Rethinking Multimodal Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Segmentation: From Fused Refinement to Decoupled Arbitration
Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 917-925.
https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/103
Keywords
- Computer Vision: 3D computer vision
- Computer Vision: Vision, language and reasoning
- Computer Vision: Segmentation, grouping and shape analysis
- Computer Vision: Transfer, low-shot, semi- and un- supervised learning
- Computer Vision: Multimodal learning
Abstract
In this paper, we revisit multimodal few-shot 3D point cloud semantic segmentation (FS-PCS), identifying a conflict in "Fuse-then-Refine" paradigms: the "Plasticity-Stability Dilemma." In addition, Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP)'s inter-class confusion can result in semantic blindness. To address these issues, we present the Decoupled-experts Arbitration Few-Shot SegNet (DA-FSS), a model that effectively distinguishes between semantic and geometric paths and mutually regularizes their gradients to achieve better generalization. DA-FSS employs the same backbone and pre-trained text encoder as the baseline MultiModal Few-Shot SegNet (MM-FSS) to generate text embeddings, which can increase cost-free modalities' utilization rate and better leverage each modality's information space. To achieve this, we propose a Parallel Expert Refinement module to generate each modal correlation. We also propose a Stacked Arbitration Module (SAM) to perform convolutional fusion and arbitrate correlations for each modality pathway. The Parallel Experts decouple two paths: a Geometric Expert maintains plasticity, and a Semantic Expert ensures stability. They are coordinated via a Decoupled Alignment Module (DAM) that transfers knowledge without propagating confusion. Experiments on popular datasets (S3DIS, ScanNet) demonstrate the superiority of DA-FSS over MM-FSS. Meanwhile, geometric boundaries, completeness, and texture differentiation are all superior to the baseline. The code is available at: https://github.com/MoWenQAQ/DA-FSS/.
- [An et al., 2024] Zhaochong An, Guolei Sun, Yun Liu, Fayao Liu, Zongwei Wu, Dan Wang, Luc Van Gool, and Serge Belongie. Rethinking few-shot 3d point cloud semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3996-4006, 2024.
- [An et al., 2025a] Zhaochong An, Guolei Sun, Yun Liu, Runjia Li, Junlin Han, Ender Konukoglu, and Serge Belongie. General- ized few-shot 3d point cloud segmentation with vision-language model. In CVPR, 2025.
- [An et al., 2025b] Zhaochong An, Guolei Sun, Yun Liu, Runjia Li, Min Wu, Ming-Ming Cheng, Ender Konukoglu, and Serge Be- longie. Multimodality helps few-shot 3d point cloud semantic segmentation. In ICLR, 2025.
- [Armeni et al., 2016] Iro Armeni, Ozan Sener, Amir R Zamir, He- len Jiang, Ioannis Brilakis, Martin Fischer, and Silvio Savarese. 3d semantic parsing of large-scale indoor spaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1534-1543, 2016.
- [Chen et al., 2023] Runnan Chen, Youquan Liu, Lingdong Kong, Xinge Zhu, Yuexin Ma, Yikang Li, Yuenan Hou, Yu Qiao, and Wenping Wang. Clip2scene: Towards label-efficient 3d scene understanding by clip. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 7020-7030, June 2023.
- [Dai et al., 2017] Angela Dai, Angel X Chang, Manolis Savva, Ma- ciej Halber, Thomas Funkhouser, and Matthias Nießner. Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5828-5839, 2017.
- [Ding et al., 2023] Runyu Ding, Jihan Yang, Chuhui Xue, Wen- qing Zhang, Song Bai, and Xiaojuan Qi. Pla: Language-driven open-vocabulary 3d scene understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (CVPR), pages 7010-7019, June 2023.
- [Guo et al., 2023] Ziyu Guo, Renrui Zhang, Xiangyang Zhu, Yi- wen Tang, Xianzheng Ma, Jiaming Han, Kexin Chen, Peng Gao, Xianzhi Li, Hongsheng Li, et al. Point-bind & point- llm: Aligning point cloud with multi-modality for 3d under- standing, generation, and instruction following. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.00615, 2023.
- [He et al., 2024] Qingdong He, Jinlong Peng, Zhengkai Jiang, Kai Wu, Xiaozhong Ji, Jiangning Zhang, Yabiao Wang, Chengjie Wang, et al. Unim-ov3d: Uni-modality open-vocabulary 3d scene understanding with fine-grained feature representation. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2024. IJCAI
- [Hong et al., 2022] Sunghwan Hong, Seokju Cho, Jisu Nam, Stephen Lin, and Seungryong Kim. Cost aggregation with 4d convolutional swin transformer for few-shot segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 108-126. Springer, 2022.
- [Hong et al., 2023] Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, and Chuang Gan. 3d-llm: Injecting the 3d world into large language models. In A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, and S. Levine, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 36, pages 20482-20494.
- Curran Associates, Inc., 2023.
- [Jacobs et al., 1991] Robert A. Jacobs, Michael I. Jordan, Steven J. Nowlan, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. Adaptive mixtures of local ex- perts. Neural Computation, 3(1):79-87, 1991.
- [Jiang et al., 2024] Li Jiang, Shaoshuai Shi, and Bernt Schiele. Open-vocabulary 3d semantic segmentation with foundation models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 21284- 21294, June 2024.
- [Lai et al., 2022] Xin Lai, Jianhui Liu, Li Jiang, Liwei Wang, Hengshuang Zhao, Shu Liu, Xiaojuan Qi, and Jiaya Jia. Stratified transformer for 3d point cloud segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recog- nition, pages 8500-8509, 2022.
- [Li et al., 2025] Shuo Li, Fang Liu, Zehua Hao, Xinyi Wang, Lin- gling Li, Xu Liu, Puhua Chen, and Wenping Ma. Logits de- confusion with clip for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (CVPR), pages 25411-25421, June 2025.
- [Liang et al., 2024] Dingkang Liang, Xin Zhou, Wei Xu, Xingkui Zhu, Zhikang Zou, Xiaoqing Ye, Xiao Tan, and Xiang Bai. Point- mamba: A simple state space model for point cloud analysis. In A. Globerson, L. Mackey, D. Belgrave, A. Fan, U. Paquet, J. Tomczak, and C. Zhang, editors, Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, volume 37, pages 32653-32677.
- Curran Associates, Inc., 2024.
- [Nguyen et al., 2024] Phuc Nguyen, Tuan Duc Ngo, Evangelos Kalogerakis, Chuang Gan, Anh Tran, Cuong Pham, and Khoi Nguyen. Open3dis: Open-vocabulary 3d instance segmentation with 2d mask guidance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4018-4028, June 2024.
- [Ning et al., 2023] Zhenhua Ning, Zhuotao Tian, et al. Boosting few-shot 3d point cloud segmentation via query-guided enhance- ment. In ACM MM, 2023.
- [Peng et al., 2023] Songyou Peng, Kyle Genova, Chiyu "Max" Jiang, Andrea Tagliasacchi, Marc Pollefeys, and Thomas Funkhouser. Openscene: 3d scene understanding with open vo- cabularies. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 815-824, June 2023.
- [Qi et al., 2017a] Charles R. Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J. Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), July 2017.
- [Qi et al., 2017b] Charles R Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. PointNet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017.
- [Qiu et al., 2024] Xinkuan Qiu, Meina Kan, Yongbin Zhou, Yan- chao Bi, and Shiguang Shan. Shape-biased cnns are not always superior in out-of-distribution robustness. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vi- sion (WACV), pages 2326-2335, January 2024.
- [Snell et al., 2017] Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, and Richard Zemel. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. In I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30.
- Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
- [Tang et al., 2024] Yiwen Tang, Ray Zhang, Zoey Guo, Xianzheng Ma, Bin Zhao, Zhigang Wang, Dong Wang, and Xuelong Li. Point-peft: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for 3d pre-trained models. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial in- telligence, volume 38, pages 5171-5179, 2024.
- [Thomas et al., 2019] Hugues Thomas, Charles R Qi, Jean- Emmanuel Deschaud, Beatriz Marcotegui, Franc ¸ois Goulette, and Leonidas J Guibas. Kpconv: Flexible and deformable convo- lution for point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF interna- tional conference on computer vision, pages 6411-6420, 2019.
- [Tu et al., 2023] Weijie Tu, Weijian Deng, and Tom Gedeon. A closer look at the robustness of contrastive language-image pre- training (clip). In A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, and S. Levine, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 36, pages 13678-13691.
- [Wang et al., 2019] Yue Wang, Yongbin Sun, Ziwei Liu, Sanjay E Sarma, Michael M Bronstein, and Justin M Solomon. Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds. ACM Transactions on Graphics (tog), 38(5):1-12, 2019.
- [Wu et al., 2024a] Jinmeng Wu, Chong Cao, Hao Zhang, Basura Fernando, Yanbin Hao, and Hanyu Hong. Pointtfa: Training-free clustering adaption for large 3d point cloud models. In Proceed- ings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence (IJCAI), 2024. IJCAI
- [Wu et al., 2024b] Xiaoyang Wu, Li Jiang, Peng-Shuai Wang, Zhi- jian Liu, Xihui Liu, Yu Qiao, Wanli Ouyang, Tong He, and Heng- shuang Zhao. Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4840-4851, June 2024.
- [Xiao et al., 2024] Aoran Xiao, Xiaoqin Zhang, Ling Shao, and Shijian Lu. A survey of label-efficient deep learning for 3d point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine In- telligence, 46(12):9139-9160, 2024.
- [Xiong et al., 2024] Guoxin Xiong, Yuan Wang, Zhaoyang Li, Wenfei Yang, Tianzhu Zhang, Xu Zhou, Shifeng Zhang, and Yongdong Zhang. Aggregation and purification: dual enhance- ment network for point cloud few-shot segmentation. In Pro- ceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-24. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (8 2024), volume 2, 2024. IJCAI
- [Xu et al., 2024] Runsen Xu, Xiaolong Wang, Tai Wang, Yilun Chen, Jiangmiao Pang, and Dahua Lin. Pointllm: Empowering large language models to understand point clouds. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 131-147. Springer, 2024.
- [Xue et al., 2023] Le Xue, Mingfei Gao, Chen Xing, Roberto Martín-Martín, Jiajun Wu, Caiming Xiong, Ran Xu, Juan Carlos Niebles, and Silvio Savarese. Ulip: Learning a unified represen- tation of language, images, and point clouds for 3d understand- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1179-1189, June 2023.
- [Xue et al., 2024] Le Xue, Ning Yu, Shu Zhang, Artemis Panagopoulou, Junnan Li, Roberto Martín-Martín, Jiajun Wu, Caiming Xiong, Ran Xu, Juan Carlos Niebles, and Silvio Savarese. Ulip-2: Towards scalable multimodal pre-training for 3d understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 27091-27101, June 2024.
- [Yang et al., 2024] Jihan Yang, Runyu Ding, Weipeng Deng, Zhe Wang, and Xiaojuan Qi. Regionplc: Regional point-language contrastive learning for open-world 3d scene understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 19823-19832, June 2024.
- [Yu et al., 2022] Xumin Yu, Lulu Tang, Yongming Rao, Tiejun Huang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Point-bert: Pre-training 3d point cloud transformers with masked point modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 19313-19322, June 2022.
- [Zhang et al., 2022] Renrui Zhang, Wei Zhang, Rongyao Fang, Peng Gao, Kunchang Li, Jifeng Dai, Yu Qiao, and Hongsheng Li. Tip-adapter: Training-free adaption of clip for few-shot clas- sification. In European conference on computer vision, pages 493-510. Springer, 2022.
- [Zhang et al., 2023] Canyu Zhang, Zhenyao Wu, Xinyi Wu, Ziyu Zhao, and Song Wang. Few-shot 3d point cloud semantic seg- mentation via stratified class-specific attention based transformer network. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 3410-3417, 2023.
- [Zhao et al., 2021] Na Zhao, Tat-Seng Chua, and Gim Hee Lee. Few-shot 3d point cloud semantic segmentation. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8873-8882, 2021.
- [Zhao et al., 2022] Borui Zhao, Quan Cui, Renjie Song, Yiyu Qiu, and Jiajun Liang. Decoupled knowledge distillation. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11953-11962, 2022.
- [Zhou et al., 2024] Junsheng Zhou, Jinsheng Wang, Baorui Ma, Yu-Shen Liu, Tiejun Huang, and Xinlong Wang. Uni3d: Ex- ploring unified 3d representation at scale. In International Con- ference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024.
- [Zhu et al., 2023] Xiangyang Zhu, Renrui Zhang, Bowei He, Ao- jun Zhou, Dong Wang, Bin Zhao, and Peng Gao. Not all fea- tures matter: Enhancing few-shot clip with adaptive prior refine- ment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 2605-2615, 2023.
References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.
Full text extracted automatically from the PDF; figures, tables and equations may differ. The PDF is the version of record.
1 Introduction
3D point cloud analysis is following the development of Label-efficient learning [Xiao et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2023] and the advent of Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and 3D-LLMs [Hong et al., 2023] has triggered a revolution in 3D scene understanding [Xu et al., 2024; Xue et al., 2024; Guo et al., 2023; Hong et al., 2023;
∗Corresponding author
Liang et al., 2024]. Through establishing a connection between point clouds and human language, some methods have broken the recognition bottleneck imposed by the closed label sets of traditional supervised learning [Qi et al., 2017a; Wang et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2024b]. Meanwhile, the paradigm shift towards leveraging foundation models is exemplified by Point-Bind [Guo et al., 2023] and ULIP-2 [Xue et al., 2024; Xue et al., 2023] which are two examples of aggregated frameworks that have successfully created a shared embedding space for 3D and human language. For instance, OpenScene [Peng et al., 2023], OV3D [Jiang et al., 2024], RegionPLC [Yang et al., 2024], UniM-OV3D [He et al., 2024], Open3DIS [Nguyen et al., 2024], and PLA [Ding et al., 2023] all demonstrate solid zero-shot generalization by building upon these semantic priors. Despite these advances, FewShot Learning (FSL) [Snell et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2021; Hong et al., 2022] is still a critical challenge due to annotated scarce data.
In the realm of MM-FS-PCS, our key insight is that MMFSS [An et al., 2025b] is the pioneering SOTA that validated the utility of VLM priors. However, we've found that MM-FSS suffers from a Plasticity-Stability Dilemma which creates a Gradient Domination. This is caused by CLIP's category confusion [Li et al., 2025; Zhu et al., 2023; Tu et al., 2023; Qiu et al., 2024], which leads to semantic hallucinations in geometrically ambiguous regions (e.g., confusing a white wall with a picture).
Specifically, CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) produces semantic features that have been trained at a large scale. Its vector norms are typically large and stable. MM-FSS chooses to freeze the parameters of CLIP (IF Head) to preserve semantic features, leveraging the VLM, aligning with the trend of parameter-efficient fine-tuning [Tang et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2022]. This leads to the problem that the model will discover that "I can achieve a high score simply by copying CLIP's semantic outputs." Thereby causing the 3D encoder to learn from 2D features in a simplistic manner, resulting in feature representations with relatively smaller norms, with semantic features dominating gradient flow.
Motivated by these important observations, a pertinent question arises: How can we limit gradient conflict and prevent category confusion? In this paper, the idea comes from the philosophy of Logits DeConfusion [Li et al., 2025], which physically separates confusion noise through residual learning. So we suggest a new paradigm "Decoupled Arbitration" to resolve this problem. We believe that geometric adaptation and semantic preservation need pathways that are completely separate from each other. Interaction should be limited to two laws: Soft Regularization which guide the geometric expert without messing up its input and Late Arbitration which only combines decisions after the decoupled decisions have been independently refined. Specifically, we introduce a novel model, Decoupled-experts Arbitration Few-Shot SegNet (DA-FSS), to leverage multimodal information more efficiently. Concretely, we develop an Adaptive Geometric Expert and a Static Semantic Expert to form the Decoupled-experts. The following Stacked Arbitration Module (SAM) performs convolutional fusion of the independently refined features from both pathways, building upon utilizing semantic guidance from textual information. Additionally, we propose Decoupled Alignment Module (DAM) enforcing the geometric expert to align with the semantic expert at the representation level so as to prevent the decoupling from causing each path to deviate excessively.
We systematically compare our DA-FSS against existing methods AttMPTI [Zhao et al., 2021], QGE [Ning et al., 2023], COSeg [An et al., 2024], and MM-FSS [An et al., 2025b] on S3DIS [Armeni et al., 2016] and ScanNet [Dai et al., 2017] datasets 4.2, suggesting the superiority of DA-FSS across various settings.
The contributions of our work are threefold: (i) We design a novel model, DA-FSS, to more effectively exploit information from different modalities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to explore decoupling in MM-FSS. (ii) Learning from the baseline's novel cost-free multimodal FSPCS design philosophy, our DA-FSS efficiently reuses the pre-trained alignment already completed by the baseline to achieve optimization without any extra parameter overhead. (iii) Extensive experimental results demonstrate the value of our proposed framework and its consistent efficacy across different few-shot settings. This work will provide a new perspective for other multimodal fusion approaches.
2 RelatedWork
2.1 Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Segmentation
Although fully-supervised methods have achieved promising results in 3D point cloud segmentation [Qi et al., 2017a; Qi et al., 2017b; Wang et al., 2019; Lai et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2024b; Yu et al., 2022], the expensive annotation costs have shifted research attention toward few-shot learning. As a pioneer, AttMPTI [Zhao et al., 2021] proposed a transductive label propagation method. Later works mainly concentrate on narrowing the semantic gap [Zhang et al., 2023; Ning et al., 2023; Ning et al., 2023; Xiong et al., 2024] and improving feature representation [An et al., 2024]. Specifically, AttMPTI [Zhao et al., 2021] and COSeg [An et al., 2024] optimize prototype correlations to reduce intraclass variance. In contrast, SCAT [Zhang et al., 2023] and QGE [Ning et al., 2023] apply advanced cross-attention mechanisms for fine-grained alignment between support and query features. However, recent observations indicate that these methods rely mainly on geometric features, which limits their generalization in complex open-world scenes (e.g., distinguishing objects with similar geometry).

2.2 Multimodal 3D Point Cloud Segmentation
With the rapid development of unimodal baselines, researchers are increasingly exploring multimodality for further performance gains. Language is currently the most popular auxiliary modality. Unified frameworks [Guo et al., 2023; Xue et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2024] align 3D point clouds with image-text spaces to boost performance . Furthermore, open-vocabulary methods (e.g., OV3D [Jiang et al., 2024], RegionPLC [Yang et al., 2024], Open3DIS [Nguyen et al., 2024], UniM-OV3D [He et al., 2024], PointTFA [Wu et al., 2024a]) utilize VLM guidance to achieve open-set segmentation. Nevertheless, these approaches are tailored primarily for fully supervised or zeroshot settings. In the context of FS-PCS, existing works still predominantly use unimodal input. Recently, MM-FSS [An et al., 2025b] and Generalized FS-PCS [An et al., 2025a] attempt to leverage multimodal information. Critically, these methods follow a "Fused Refinement" paradigm. We observe that the aggressive fusion in these works leads to Gradient Domination. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to introduce decoupled expert arbitration [Li et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2022] into multimodal FSPCS.
3 Methodology
3.1 Problem Setup
Multimodal FS-PCS. Following prior works [An et al., 2024; An et al., 2025b], we formulate this task as the popular episodic paradigm. Each N-way K-shot episode comprises a support set S = {Xn,k s , Y n,k s } and a query set Q = {Xq, Yq}, where X and Y denote the point cloud and corresponding labels, respectively. The goal is to segment query samples Xq into N target classes and 'background' by leveraging knowledge from S. Following the multimodal setting, our DA-FSS introduces textual and 2D modalities.

3.2 Motivation
Current SOTA methods [An et al., 2025b] typically adopt an early fusion strategy, obtaining a joint representation H = σ(W · [Fgeo ⊕Fsem]). Although this is a simple and intuitive approach, we argue that this paradigm creates a fundamental optimization conflict : during meta-training, the gradient flow to the geometric encoder called UF Head [An et al., 2025b] is always coupled with the semantic branch called IF Head [An et al., 2025b]:
We identify two issues in this interaction: (1) The static semantic features Fsem (from frozen VLMs) typically exhibit significantly larger norms than the adaptive geometric features, numerically overwhelming the sparse geometric gradients. (2) Frozen VLMs suffer from inherent texture bias [Li et al., 2025; Tu et al., 2023]. In geometrically ambiguous regions, the optimization shortcut provided by texture semantics suppresses the learning of structural details.
Consequently, the UF Head fails to adapt effectively, a phenomenon we term Plasticity Decay:
We provide concrete evidence of this phenomenon in Figure 1. By monitoring the training dynamics, we observe that the baseline's geometric gradients (Orange) are strictly suppressed by the semantic branch, effectively rendering the backbone "lazy" so that the UF Head will only obey the VLM's guidance from the IF Head (Frozen) without learning to optimize itself. This observation motivates us to physically decouple the optimization pathways to restore the backbone's vitality.
3.3 Method Overview
The overall architecture of the proposed DA-FSS is depicted in Figure 2. Given support and query point clouds, we first generate two sets of dense correlations: intermodal correlations from the Intermodal Feature (IF) head and unimodal correlations from the Unimodal Feature (UF) head. Both intermodal and unimodal correlations are then forwarded to the Parallel Expert Refinement module to independently produce refined geometric and semantic features. Beyond independent refinement, we use the Decoupled Alignment Module (DAM) to bridge the modal gap. This module acts as a soft regularizer to align the experts without gradient interference. We then exploit useful boundary-injected guidance to synthesize the final decision in the Stacked Arbitration Module (SAM).
Existing MultiModal FS-PCS approaches [An et al., 2025b] typically have two training steps: a pretraining step for obtaining an effective feature extractor, and a metalearning step towards few-shot segmentation tasks. Our method follows this two-step training paradigm. First, we pretrain the backbone and IF head using 3D point clouds and 2D images. To more objectively demonstrate our improvement results, we chose to directly use the same method as MM-FSS does, or even download officially released pretrained weights directly. Second, we conduct meta-learning to train the model end-to-end while freezing the backbone and IF head to maintain stability. In the following, we elaborate on Parallel Experts, DAM, and SAM modules.
3.4 Parallel Experts Refinement
Inspired by Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) [Jacobs et al., 1991], we propose the Parallel Experts module, as illustrated in Figure 2 to preserve the unique characteristics of each modality. Following [An et al., 2025b], we first merge correlations to capture support-query interactions. The Unimodal Correlation C u ∈ RNq×Ns captures geometric similarity, while the Intermodal Correlation C i ∈ RNq×Ns captures semantic affinity using VLM projections. This enhanced comprehension promotes the transfer of knowledge from the support set to the query point cloud, thereby refining segmentation outcomes.MM-FSS chose to sum C u and C i , but we do not opt for this approach; conversely, we propose that:
Adaptive Geometric Expert (Tgeo). This expert is fully learnable and responsible for Plasticity by receiving C u , which focuses on capturing task-specific structural variations. To this end, we employ a standard Transformer Layer (incorporating MHSA) to capture the holistic feature tensor of Hgeo (192-dimensional):
Static Semantic Expert (Tsem). This expert is fully learnable and responsible for Stability by receiving C i , which leverages the frozen VLM priors. This is to provide a consistent semantic reference robust to few-shot noise. Although this expert's functions differ, we have chosen an identical design but Hsem (512-dimensional):
Crucially, by isolating these pathways (I(Rgeo;Rsem) ≈ 0 during refinement), we ensure the experts are optimized solely based on features unique to their respective responsibilities, thereby protecting UF head against semantic gradient domination.
3.5 Decoupled Alignment Module (DAM)
While the Parallel Experts module effectively isolates interference between modalities, the consistency would largely disappear due to decoupling, which could lead to feature divergence. However, we cannot forcibly intervene to rigidly align the features of the two modules. Therefore, we propose the DAM, as illustrated in Fig. 2. DAM integrates structural consensus from the semantic expert to regularize the geometric expert. Additionally, since raw semantic priors contain fixed confusion patterns [Li et al., 2025], DAM employs a stop-gradient strategy to filter out texture noise, accounting for the reliability gap between adaptive and frozen features.
Prototype Loss Regularization (PLR). Given learnable geometric prototypes Pu and frozen semantic prototypes Pi, since the semantic prototypes Pi originate from stable VLM priors, they provide informative guidance on the true semantic manifold. Therefore, we first compute the alignment distance between them to generate structural constraints LPLR. Specifically, we project Pu (192-dimensional) to the dimension of Pi (512-dimensional) via a linear layer Fproj and minimize:
where sg(·) denotes the stop-gradient operator. Note that this effectively uses the semantic prototype as a "Teacher" anchor, ensuring the geometric encoder learns the semantic structure without inheriting confusion gradients.
Decoupled Consistency Regularization (DCR). Next, to enforce consistency at the decision boundary, we minimize the divergence between the probability distributions of the two experts (pgeo, psem). Since confusion patterns are often manifested in the logits distribution, the regularization term is computed as follows:
Through this interaction, Tsem can also learn the specialized adaptation of the other branch, rather than solely optimizing itself. This is akin to how a "teacher" typically influences a student, yet the "student" can also subtly impact their own "teacher."
This DAM module fully leverages the stability of the semantic expert to guide the plasticity of the geometric expert, helping to maintain feature coherence. Note that it uses stopgradient operators to prevent the propagation of confusion noise, improving the effective collaboration of decoupled experts.
3.6 Stacked ArbitrationModule (SAM)
While the two experts can make predictions independently; without fusing and refining these two predictions, the multimodal system cannot fully realize its potential for crosschecking and compensating for deficiencies. To synthesize the final prediction from the refined experts, we propose the Stacked Arbitration Module (SAM). Unlike prior works that rely on simple concatenation, we opt for a Stacked Transformer Arbitration architecture to model global interactions between geometric and semantic evidences.
Feature Merging Layer. We first project the concatenated expert outputs into a unified space (192-dimensional). Consistent with our implementation, Batch Normalization (BN) is applied pre-fusion to calibrate the scale discrepancy between adaptive and static features, followed by a 1 × 1 convolution and ReLU activation:
| Method | 1-way 1-shot | 1-way 5-shot | 2-way 1-shot | 2-way 5-shot | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S0 | S1 | Mean | S0 | S1 | Mean | S0 | S1 | Mean | S0 | S1 | Mean | |
| Official Results (from Literature) | ||||||||||||
| AttMPTI [Zhao et al., 2021] | 36.32 | 38.36 | 37.34 | 46.71 | 42.70 | 44.71 | 31.09 | 29.62 | 30.36 | 39.53 | 32.62 | 36.08 |
| QGE [Ning et al., 2023] | 41.69 | 39.09 | 40.39 | 50.59 | 46.41 | 48.50 | 33.45 | 30.95 | 32.20 | 40.53 | 36.13 | 38.33 |
| COSeg [An et al., 2024] | 47.17 | 48.37 | 47.77 | 50.93 | 49.88 | 50.41 | 37.15 | 38.99 | 38.07 | 42.73 | 40.25 | 41.49 |
| MM-FSS [An et al., 2025b] | 49.84 | 54.33 | 52.09 | 51.95 | 56.46 | 54.21 | 41.98 | 46.61 | 44.30 | 46.02 | 54.29 | 50.16 |
| Reproduced Environment (Strict Control) | ||||||||||||
| MM-FSS† (Official Weights) | 48.50 | 54.15 | 51.33 | 51.76 | 56.43 | 54.10 | 41.70 | 47.00 | 44.35 | 45.67 | 54.82 | 50.25 |
| Ours (DA-FSS) | 49.14 | 55.93 | 52.54↑1.21 | 51.90 | 60.45 | 56.18↑2.08 | 42.07 | 47.16 | 44.62↑0.27 | 45.78 | 56.30 | 51.04↑0.79 |
| Method | 1-way 1-shot | 1-way 5-shot | 2-way 1-shot | 2-way 5-shot | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S0 | S1 | Mean | S0 | S1 | Mean | S0 | S1 | Mean | S0 | S1 | Mean | |
| Official Results (from Literature) | ||||||||||||
| AttMPTI [Zhao et al., 2021] | 34.03 | 30.97 | 32.50 | 39.09 | 37.15 | 38.12 | 25.99 | 23.88 | 24.94 | 30.41 | 27.35 | 28.88 |
| QGE [Ning et al., 2023] | 37.38 | 33.02 | 35.20 | 45.08 | 41.89 | 43.49 | 26.85 | 25.17 | 26.01 | 28.35 | 31.49 | 29.92 |
| COSeg [An et al., 2024] | 41.95 | 42.07 | 42.01 | 48.54 | 44.68 | 46.61 | 29.54 | 28.51 | 29.03 | 36.87 | 34.15 | 35.51 |
| MM-FSS [An et al., 2025b] | 46.08 | 43.37 | 44.73 | 54.66 | 45.48 | 50.07 | 43.99 | 34.43 | 39.21 | 48.86 | 39.32 | 44.09 |
| Reproduced Environment (Strict Control) | ||||||||||||
| MM-FSS† (Official Weights) | 45.68 | 43.23 | 44.46 | 54.80 | 45.79 | 50.30 | 44.01 | 34.44 | 39.23 | 49.11 | 39.48 | 44.20 |
| Ours (DA-FSS) | 48.95 | 41.96 | 45.46↑1.00 | 55.40 | 46.30 | 50.85↑0.55 | 45.01 | 34.53 | 39.77↑0.54 | 50.61 | 40.45 | 45.53↑1.33 |
Dual-Guidance Injection. We inject inductive biases strictly at the boundaries using a "Negative-Suppression, Positive-Enhancement" strategy:
- Input: Background Suppression (Gbase). At the input of every Transformer layer, we explicitly inject Base-Class Guidance (Gbase) to refine the background representation. Specifically, we concatenate Gbase with the background token Rbg to suppress easy negatives early, while leaving foreground tokens Rfg untouched:
This can lend the model a more hierarchical structure, enabling further refinement of the feature space.
- Output: Semantic Gating (Gq). At the final layer, we employ a multiplicative gating mechanism derived from the target class embedding (Gq). This acts as a semantic gate to enhance foreground precision by scaling the feature magnitude based on textual affinity:
where ⊙ denotes element-wise multiplication and σ is a scaling function.
This effectively mitigates issues of over-suppression or overamplification while also reducing the parameter overhead in deep stacks beyond two layers.
3.7 Optimization Objective
After the Stacked Arbitration Module (SAM), the synthesized feature tensor Rfinal is transformed into the final prediction ˆ Pq ∈ RNq×(Nway+1) by a decoder comprising a KPConv [Thomas et al., 2019] layer and an MLP classifier. The whole model is optimized end-to-end by minimizing a compound objective function. To ensure expert coordination without compromising individual plasticity, we integrate the segmentation task with decoupled alignment constraints:
where Lseg is the standard cross-entropy loss between ˆ Pq and the ground-truth Yq, and Lbase checks the predictions for the base class. This formulation ensures a cooperative optimization: vertical gradients from Lseg optimize the decision boundary, while horizontal gradients from the alignment terms maintain expert coordination.
4 Experiments
In this section, we conduct extensive experiments to validate our proposed Decoupled-experts Arbitration (DA-FSS) framework. We first introduce the experimental setup. Then, we compare our method with state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches on two challenging benchmarks: S3DIS [Armeni et al., 2016] and ScanNet [Dai et al., 2017]. Finally, we perform detailed ablation studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of each key component in our architecture.
4.1 Experimental Setup
Datasets. We evaluate our method on two standard fewshot 3D point cloud segmentation benchmarks: S3DIS [Armeni et al., 2016] and ScanNet [Dai et al., 2017]. S3DIS contains 3D scans from 6 large-scale indoor areas. ScanNet consists of 1513 scanned indoor scenes. We adopt the official benchmark splits [Dai et al., 2017], which contain 20 semantic classes. Their semantic classes are split into 2 folds (S0 and S1 ) for cross-validation. Following prior works [An et al., 2025b; Zhao et al., 2021], we maintain a maximum of 20,480 points per block using a 0.02m grid size.

Evaluation Protocol. We follow the standard N-way Kshot episodic evaluation protocol. The primary evaluation metric is the mean Intersection-over-Union (mIoU) over all foreground classes. As in [An et al., 2025b; An et al., 2024], we report results on 1-way 1-shot, 1-way 5-shot, 2-way 1shot, and 2-way 5-shot settings where the evaluation sets consist of 1,000 episodes per class in the 1-way setting and 100 episodes per class combination in the 2-way setting.
Implementation Details. We adopt the same backbone (Stratified Transformer) [Lai et al., 2022] and feature head architecture as MM-FSS [An et al., 2025b] for fair comparison. Following the standard protocol [An et al., 2025b], we initialize the 3D backbone with pre-trained weights that use the AdamW optimizer, setting a weight decay of 0.01 and a learning rate of 0.006 during pretraining in 100 epochs. Isolating the source of improvement, we choose to download officially released pre-trained weights directly. During the meta-learning phase, the model is trained using the AdamW optimizer with an initial learning rate of 0.0001 and a weight decay of 0.01. For our DA-FSS architecture, we set the number of layers in the Stacked Arbitration Module (SAM) to N = 1 for S3DIS and N = 2 for ScanNet. For the Decoupled Alignment Module (DAM), the loss weights are set to λPLR = 0.001 and λDCR = 0.5 based on empirical tuning.
4.2 Comparison with State-of-the-Art
We compare our DA-FSS with previous state-of-the-art methods on S3DIS [Armeni et al., 2016] and ScanNet [Dai et al., 2017], as detailed in Table 1 and Table 2. To ensure a fair assessment, we reproduced the leading baseline MM-FSS [An et al., 2025b] (denoted as MM-FSS† ) using its officially released pre-trained weights under our strictly controlled evaluation protocol. In contrast, DA-FSS consistently outperforms the former state-of-the-art across all settings, demonstrating the improved stable generalization brought by decoupling, which enhances the utilization rate of information from pretrained weights.
Specifically, on the S3DIS dataset, DA-FSS records mIoU increases of +1.21% in the 1-way-1-shot setting-which relies heavily on intrinsic geometric generalization. Furthermore, in 1-way-1-shot setting on the ScanNet dataset, DA- FSS has also achieved +1.00% improvement over MM-FSS. Notably, DA-FSS surpasses the baseline by +1.33% in the 2way 5-shot setting (see Supp. Material for full tables) that our Decoupled Arbitration mechanism effectively disentangles inter-class semantics under high interference, while simultaneously enforcing intra-class prototype stability through alignment constraints.
| Config. | Architecture Detail | DAM | mIoU (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (A) Base | MM-FSS (Fused) [An et al., 2025b] | ✗ | 44.46 |
| (B) Ours | Core Arch. (Decoupled) | ✗ | 44.95 |
| (C) Ours Full Model (Decoupled+DAM) | ✓ | 45.46 | |
| Method | FLOPs (G) | Params (M) | mIoU (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MM-FSS† | 19.06 | 10.45 | 44.46 |
| Ours (DA-FSS) | 18.76 | 10.18 | 45.46 |
| Diff. | -0.30 | -0.27 | +1.00 |
| Method | mIoU | mAcc(%) | MechanismExplanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| MM-FSS† | 44.46 | 68.33∗ | Catastrophic Miss (High FN) |
| Ours | 45.46 | 79.29∗ | Object Recovered (High Recall) |
| Gain | +1.0 | +10.9 | Solves Semantic Blindness |
Table 3: Comprehensive analysis on ScanNet (1-way 1-shot). We analyze (a) architectural effectiveness, (b) computational complexity, and (c) the specific impact of decoupling. Note: DA-FSS achieves a massive surge in mAcc.
Remarkably, beyond standard mIoU metrics, our DA-FSS demonstrates a substantial improvement in Mean Accuracy (mAcc) on ScanNet. In settings where mIoU gains appear moderate (e.g., ScanNet 1-way 1-shot), our mAcc often surges by approximately +10% compared to the baseline shown in Table 3(c).
Although in some cases ours (DA-FSS) may induce oversegmentation due to its tendency to preserve geometric completeness with high-variance class confusion (which penalizes IoU heavily), this very tendency actually aids the model in more accurately segmenting points that should have been correctly identified. We prioritize semantic completeness over boundary precision, arguing that successfully identifying the target outweighs the cost of minor over-segmentation in 1-way 1-shot setting.
4.3 Ablation Studies
In this section, we conduct a series of ablation studies. Unless specified otherwise, all ablation experiments are performed on the ScanNet dataset under the 1-way 1-shot setting, as this setting is most sensitive to feature quality and generalization capability.
Effectiveness of DA-FSS Architecture. Table 3(a) validates our core hypothesis: "Decoupling" is structurally superior to "Fusion." Comparing (A) and (B), we observe that mIoU increases by approximately +0.49% solely through the decoupled design, even when all other components are disabled. This confirms that simply removing the early fusion bottleneck brings gains by mitigating the plasticity-stability conflict. Comparing (B) and (C), we achieved a +0.51% improvement after enabling all modules. This proves that while decoupling is essential, the experts must be coordinated via regularization (our DAM) to prevent divergence and achieve optimal alignment thereby optimizing the utilization of information interaction across various modalities..
Complexity Analysis. Finally, Table 3(b) highlights the efficiency of our design. Our DA-FSS achieves a significant performance gain (+1.00% mIoU) over the MM-FSS baseline while actually reducing computational overhead (-0.30 GFLOPs) and parameters (-0.27 M). This confirms that our gains stem from the superior decoupled architecture, not from increased model capacity.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, we identify a critical conflict in FS-PCS: the "Plasticity-Stability Dilemma," which has undermined the validity of previous progress in fusion-based paradigms. To rectify this issue, we present DA-FSS designed to decouple geometric adaptation from semantic preservation to maximize its adaptability across modalities. DA-FSS combines Parallel Experts to effectively aggregate features, enriching the comprehension of novel concepts from both geometric and semantic perspectives, which are mutually important for recovering missing parts. Furthermore, to ensure expert coordination despite decoupling, we introduce the DAM, which mutually regularizes gradients via prototype alignment. Finally, we introduce the SAM to fuse dualpath features and dynamically synthesize final decisions using boundary-injected guidance. DA-FSS achieves significant improvements over existing methods across all settings, particularly in boosting point-wise accuracy (mAcc). Overall, our research provides valuable insights into the importance of Decoupled Arbitration in FS-PCS and suggests promising directions for future studies.
@inproceedings{ijcai2026p103,
title = {Rethinking Multimodal Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Segmentation: From Fused Refinement to Decoupled Arbitration},
author = {Bian, Wentao and Xu, Fenglei},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-26}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization},
editor = {Diego Calvanese},
pages = {917--925},
year = {2026},
month = {8},
note = {Main Track},
doi = {10.24963/ijcai.2026/103},
url = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/103},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - Rethinking Multimodal Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Segmentation: From Fused Refinement to Decoupled Arbitration AU - Bian, Wentao AU - Xu, Fenglei T2 - Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-26 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization PY - 2026 SP - 917 EP - 925 DO - 10.24963/ijcai.2026/103 UR - https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/103 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents: