Can Large Models Teach Student Models to Solve Mathematical Problems Like Human Beings? A Reasoning Distillation Method via Multi-LoRA Interaction
Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 8177-8185.
https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/909
Keywords
- Natural Language Processing: NLP: Language models
- Natural Language Processing: NLP: Language generation
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated that Large Language Models (LLMs) have strong mathematical reasoning abilities but rely on hundreds of billions of parameters. To tackle the challenge of poor reasoning in Small Language Models (SLMs), existing methods typically leverage LLMs to generate massive amounts of data for cramming training. In psychology, they are akin to System 1 thinking, which resolves reasoning problems rapidly based on experience and intuition. However, human learning also requires System 2 thinking, where knowledge is first acquired and then reinforced through practice. Inspired by such two distinct modes of thinking, we propose a novel method based on the multi-LoRA Interaction for mathematical reasoning Distillation (LoRID). First, we input the question and reasoning of each sample into an LLM to create knowledge-enhanced datasets. Subsequently, we train a LoRA block on the student model as an Intuitive Reasoner (IR), which directly generates Chain-of-Thoughts for problem-solving. Then, to imitate System 2 thinking, we train the Knowledge Generator (KG) and Deep Reasoner (DR), respectively. The former outputs only knowledge after receiving problems, while the latter uses that knowledge to perform reasoning. Finally, to address the randomness in the generation of IR and DR, we evaluate whether their outputs are consistent, and the inference process needs to be iterated if not. This step can enhance the mathematical reasoning ability of SLMs through mutual feedback. Experimental results show that LoRID achieves state-of-the-art performance, especially on the GSM8K dataset, where it outperforms the second-best method by 2.3%, 16.1%, 2.4%, 12.3%, and 1.8% accuracy across the five base models, respectively. Meanwhile, we select four strong baselines as System 1, and after integrating them with our method, the reasoning ability of student models is consistently and significantly improved. The datasets and codes are available at https://github.com/Xinhe-Li/LoRID.
@inproceedings{ijcai2025p909,
title = {Can Large Models Teach Student Models to Solve Mathematical Problems Like Human Beings? A Reasoning Distillation Method via Multi-LoRA Interaction},
author = {Li, Xinhe and Liu, Jiajun and Wang, Peng},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-25}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization},
editor = {James Kwok},
pages = {8177--8185},
year = {2025},
month = {8},
note = {Main Track},
doi = {10.24963/ijcai.2025/909},
url = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/909},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - Can Large Models Teach Student Models to Solve Mathematical Problems Like Human Beings? A Reasoning Distillation Method via Multi-LoRA Interaction AU - Li, Xinhe AU - Liu, Jiajun AU - Wang, Peng T2 - Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-25 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization PY - 2025 SP - 8177 EP - 8185 DO - 10.24963/ijcai.2025/909 UR - https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/909 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents: