Counterfactual Explanations Under Model Multiplicity and Their Use in Computational Argumentation
Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 4321-4329.
https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/481
Keywords
- Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: KRR: Argumentation
- AI Ethics, Trust, Fairness: ETF: Explainability and interpretability
Abstract
Counterfactual explanations (CXs) are widely recognised as an essential technique for providing recourse recommendations for AI models.
However, it is not obvious how to determine CXs in model multiplicity scenarios, where equally performing but different models can be obtained for the same task.
In this paper, we propose novel qualitative and quantitative definitions of CXs based on explicit, nested quantification over (groups) of model decisions.
We also study properties of these notions and identify decision problems of interest therefor.
While our CXs are broadly applicable, in this paper we instantiate them within computational argumentation where model multiplicity naturally emerges, e.g. with incomplete and case-based argumentation frameworks.
We then illustrate the suitability of our CXs for model multiplicity in legal and healthcare contexts, before analysing the complexity of the associated decision problems.
@inproceedings{ijcai2025p481,
title = {Counterfactual Explanations Under Model Multiplicity and Their Use in Computational Argumentation},
author = {Alfano, Gianvincenzo and Gould, Adam and Leofante, Francesco and Rago, Antonio and Toni, Francesca},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-25}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization},
editor = {James Kwok},
pages = {4321--4329},
year = {2025},
month = {8},
note = {Main Track},
doi = {10.24963/ijcai.2025/481},
url = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/481},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - Counterfactual Explanations Under Model Multiplicity and Their Use in Computational Argumentation AU - Alfano, Gianvincenzo AU - Gould, Adam AU - Leofante, Francesco AU - Rago, Antonio AU - Toni, Francesca T2 - Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-25 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization PY - 2025 SP - 4321 EP - 4329 DO - 10.24963/ijcai.2025/481 UR - https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/481 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents: