The Proportional Veto Principle for Approval Ballots
Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 3900-3907.
https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/434
Keywords
- Game Theory and Economic Paradigms: GTEP: Computational social choice
Abstract
The proportional veto principle, which captures the idea that a candidate vetoed by a large group of voters should not be chosen, has been studied for ranked ballots in single-winner voting. We introduce a version of this principle for approval ballots, which we call flexible-voter representation (FVR). We show that while the approval voting rule and other natural scoring rules provide the optimal FVR guarantee only for some flexibility threshold, there exists a scoring rule that is FVR-optimal for all thresholds simultaneously. We also extend our results to multi-winner voting.
@inproceedings{ijcai2025p434,
title = {The Proportional Veto Principle for Approval Ballots},
author = {Halpern, Daniel and Procaccia, Ariel D. and Suksompong, Warut},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-25}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization},
editor = {James Kwok},
pages = {3900--3907},
year = {2025},
month = {8},
note = {Main Track},
doi = {10.24963/ijcai.2025/434},
url = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/434},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - The Proportional Veto Principle for Approval Ballots AU - Halpern, Daniel AU - Procaccia, Ariel D. AU - Suksompong, Warut T2 - Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-25 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization PY - 2025 SP - 3900 EP - 3907 DO - 10.24963/ijcai.2025/434 UR - https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/434 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents: