{"type":"ScholarlyArticle","title":"Preferences and Constraints in Abstract Argumentation","authors":[{"name":"Gianvincenzo Alfano","slug":"gianvincenzo-alfano","given":"Gianvincenzo","family":"Alfano","affiliation":"DIMES Department , University of Calabria , Rende , Italy"},{"name":"Sergio Greco","slug":"sergio-greco","given":"Sergio","family":"Greco","affiliation":"DIMES Department , University of Calabria , Rende , Italy"},{"name":"Francesco Parisi","slug":"francesco-parisi","given":"Francesco","family":"Parisi","affiliation":"DIMES Department , University of Calabria , Rende , Italy"},{"name":"Irina Trubitsyna","slug":"irina-trubitsyna","given":"Irina","family":"Trubitsyna","affiliation":"DIMES Department , University of Calabria , Rende , Italy"}],"abstract":"In recent years there has been an increasing interest in extending Dung's framework to facilitate the knowledge representation and reasoning process.\r\nIn this paper, we present an extension of Abstract Argumentation Framework (AF) that allows for the representation of preferences over arguments' truth values (3-valued preferences).\r\nFor instance, we can express a preference stating that extensions where argument a is false (i.e. defeated) are preferred to extensions where argument b is false. \r\nInterestingly, such a framework generalizes the well-known Preference-based AF  with no additional cost in terms of computational complexity for most of the classical argumentation semantics.\r\nThen, we further extend AF by considering both (3-valued) preferences and 3-valued constraints, that is constraints of the form \\varphi \\Rightarrow v or v \\Rightarrow \\varphi, where \\varphi is a logical formula and v is a 3-valued truth value. \r\nAfter investigating the complexity of the resulting framework,as both constraints and preferences may represent subjective knowledge of agents, \r\nwe extend our framework by considering multiple agents and study the complexity of deciding acceptance of arguments in this context.","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2023/345","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2023/345","pdf":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2023/0345.pdf","markdown":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2023/345.md","bibtex":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2023/bibtex/345","volume":{"slug":"2023","title":"Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","short_title":"IJCAI 2023","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2023/","year":2023,"location":"Macao, SAR","dates":"19-25 August 2023","editors":"Edith Elkind","isbn":"978-1-956792-03-4","publisher":"International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization","doi_prefix":"10.24963/ijcai.2023"},"section":"Knowledge Representation and Reasoning","track":"Main Track","number":345,"pages":{"first":3095,"last":3103},"keywords":["Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: KRR: Argumentation"],"videos":[],"references":[{"position":1,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2018] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, G. I. Simari, and G. R. Simari. Incremental computation of war- ranted arguments in dynamic defeasible argumentation: the rule addition case. In Proc. of SAC, pages 911-917. ACM, 2018.","title":"Incremental computation of warranted arguments in dynamic defeasible argumentation: the rule addition case","authors":"G Alfano, S Greco, F Parisi, G I Simari, G R Simari","year":"2018","venue":"Proc. of SAC","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":2,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2020] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, and I. Trubitsyna. On the semantics of abstract argumenta- tion frameworks: A logic programming approach. TPLP, 20(5):703-718, 2020.","title":"On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: A logic programming approach","authors":"G Alfano, S Greco, F Parisi, I Trubitsyna","year":"2020","venue":"TPLP","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":3,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2021a] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, G. I. Simari, and G. Ricardo Simari. Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowl- edge bases. Artif. Intell., 300:103553, 2021.","title":"Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases","authors":"Alfano","year":"2021","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":4,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2021b] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, and I. Trubitsyna. Argumentation frameworks with strong and weak constraints: Semantics and complexity. In Proc. of AAAI, pages 6175-6184, 2021.","title":"Argumentation frameworks with strong and weak constraints: Semantics and complexity","authors":"Alfano","year":"2021","venue":"Proc. of AAAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":5,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2022a] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, and I. Trubitsyna. Incomplete argumentation frameworks: Properties and complexity. In Proc. of AAAI, pages 5451- 5460, 2022.","title":"Incomplete argumentation frameworks: Properties and complexity","authors":"Alfano","year":"2022","venue":"Proc. of AAAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":6,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2022b] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, and I. Trubitsyna. On preferences and priority rules in abstract argumentation. In Proc. of IJCAI, pages 2517-2524, 2022.","title":"On preferences and priority rules in abstract argumentation","authors":"Alfano","year":"2022","venue":"Proc. of IJCAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/2022/349"},{"position":7,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2023a] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, and I. Trubitsyna. Abstract argumentation frame- work with conditional preferences. Preprint of AAAI, https://tinyurl.com/bderyv5c, 2023.","title":"Abstract argumentation framework with conditional preferences","authors":"Alfano","year":"2023","venue":"Preprint of AAAI","doi":null,"url":"https://tinyurl.com/bderyv5c,2023","internal_url":null},{"position":8,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2023b] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, and I. Trubitsyna. Epistemic abstract argumentation frame- work: Formal foundations, computation and complexity. Preprint of AAMAS, https://tinyurl.com/y632z7vt, 2023.","title":"Epistemic abstract argumentation framework: Formal foundations, computation and complexity","authors":"Alfano","year":"2023","venue":"Preprint of AAMAS","doi":null,"url":"https://tinyurl.com/y632z7vt,2023","internal_url":null},{"position":9,"raw":"[Alfano et al., 2023c] G. Alfano, S. Greco, F. Parisi, and I. Trubitsyna. On acceptance conditions in abstract argu- mentation frameworks. Inf. Sci., 625:757-779, 2023.","title":"On acceptance conditions in abstract argumentation frameworks","authors":"Alfano","year":"2023","venue":"Inf. Sci","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":10,"raw":"[Amgoud and Cayrol, 1998] L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argu- mentation. In Proc. of UAI, pages 1-7, 1998.","title":"On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation","authors":"L Amgoud, C Cayrol","year":"1998","venue":"Proc. of UAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":11,"raw":"[Amgoud and Cayrol, 2002] L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. In- ferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumenta- tion frameworks. J. Autom. Reason., 29(2):125-169, 2002.","title":"Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks","authors":"L Amgoud, C Cayrol","year":"2002","venue":"J. Autom. Reason","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":12,"raw":"[Amgoud and Vesic, 2011] L. Amgoud and S. Vesic. A new approach for preference-based argumentation fra- meworks. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 63(2):149-183, 2011.","title":"A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks","authors":"L Amgoud, S Vesic","year":"2011","venue":"Ann. Math. Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":13,"raw":"[Amgoud and Vesic, 2014] L. Amgoud and S. Vesic. Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Ap- prox. Reason., 55(2):585-606, 2014.","title":"Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks","authors":"L Amgoud, S Vesic","year":"2014","venue":"Int. J. Approx. Reason","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":14,"raw":"[Arieli, 2015] O. Arieli. Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks. J. Appl. Log., 13(4):582-604, 2015.","title":"Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks","authors":"O Arieli","year":"2015","venue":"J. Appl. Log","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":15,"raw":"[Baroni et al., 2011] P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, and G. Guida. AFRA: Argumentation Framework with Recur- sive Attacks. IJAR, 52(1):19-37, 2011.","title":"AFRA: Argumentation Framework with Recursive Attacks","authors":"P Baroni, F Cerutti, M Giacomin, G Guida","year":"2011","venue":"IJAR","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":16,"raw":"[Baumeister et al., 2021] D. Baumeister, M. Järvisalo, D. Neugebauer, A. Niskanen, and J. Rothe. Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell., page 103470, 2021.","title":"Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks","authors":"D Baumeister, M Järvisalo, D Neugebauer, A Niskanen, J Rothe","year":"2021","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":17,"raw":"[Bench-Capon et al., 2005] T. J. M. Bench-Capon, K. Atkin- son, and A. Chorley. Persuasion and value in legal argu- ment. J. Log. Comput., 15(6):1075-1097, 2005.","title":"Persuasion and value in legal argument","authors":"T J M Bench-Capon, K Atkinson, A Chorley","year":"2005","venue":"J. Log. Comput","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":18,"raw":"[Berry, 1952] George DW Berry. Peirce's contributions to the logic of statements and quantifiers. In Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, pages 153-165. 1952.","title":"Peirce's contributions to the logic of statements and quantifiers","authors":"D W George, Berry","year":"1952","venue":"Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":19,"raw":"[Bonzon et al., 2018] E. Bonzon, J. Delobelle, S. Konieczny, and N. Maudet. Combining extension-based semantics and ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In Proc. of KR, pages 118-127, 2018.","title":"Combining extension-based semantics and ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation","authors":"E Bonzon, J Delobelle, S Konieczny, N Maudet","year":"2018","venue":"Proc. of KR","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":20,"raw":"[Brewka et al., 2003] G. Brewka, I. Niemelä, and M. Truszczynski. Answer set optimization. In Proc. IJCAI, pages 867-872, 2003.","title":"Answer set optimization","authors":"G Brewka, I Niemelä, M Truszczynski","year":"2003","venue":"Proc. IJCAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":21,"raw":"[Brewka et al., 2013] G. Brewka, H. Strass, S. Ellmauthaler, J. P. Wallner, and S. Woltran. Abstract dialectical frame- works revisited. In Proc. of IJCAI, pages 803-809, 2013.","title":"Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited","authors":"G Brewka, H Strass, S Ellmauthaler, J P Wallner, S Woltran","year":"2013","venue":"Proc. of IJCAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/2013/125"},{"position":22,"raw":"[Caminada, 2006] M. Caminada. On the issue of reinstate- ment in argumentation. In JELIA, pages 111-123, 2006.","title":"On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation","authors":"M Caminada","year":"2006","venue":"JELIA","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":23,"raw":"[Cayrol et al., 2018] C. Cayrol, J. Fandinno, L. F. del Cerro, and M.-C. Lagasquie-Schiex. Structure-based semantics of argumentation frameworks with higher-order attacks and supports. In Proc. of COMMA, pages 29-36, 2018.","title":"Structure-based semantics of argumentation frameworks with higher-order attacks and supports","authors":"C Cayrol, J Fandinno, L F Del Cerro, M.-C Lagasquie-Schiex","year":"2018","venue":"Proc. of COMMA","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":24,"raw":"[Cohen et al., 2015] A. Cohen, S. Gottifredi, A. J. Garcia, and G. R. Simari. An approach to abstract argumen- tation with recursive attack and support. J. Appl. Log., 13(4):509-533, 2015.","title":"An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support","authors":"A Cohen, S Gottifredi, A J Garcia, G R Simari","year":"2015","venue":"J. Appl. Log","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":25,"raw":"[Conitzer, 2019] V. Conitzer. Designing preferences, beliefs, and identities for artificial intelligence. In Proc. of AAAI, pages 9755-9759. AAAI Press, 2019.","title":"Designing preferences, beliefs, and identities for artificial intelligence","authors":"V Conitzer","year":"2019","venue":"Proc. of AAAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":26,"raw":"[Coste-Marquis et al., 2006] S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, and P. Marquis. Constrained argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of KR, pages 112-122, 2006.","title":"Constrained argumentation frameworks","authors":"S Coste-Marquis, C Devred, P Marquis","year":"2006","venue":"Proc. of KR","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":27,"raw":"[Cyras, 2016] K. Cyras. Argumentation-based reasoning with preferences. In PAAMS, pages 199-210, 2016.","title":"Argumentation-based reasoning with preferences","authors":"K Cyras","year":"2016","venue":"PAAMS","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":28,"raw":"[Domshlak et al., 2011] C. Domshlak, E. Hüllermeier, S. Kaci, and H. Prade. Preferences in AI: an overview. Artif. Intell., 175(7-8):1037-1052, 2011.","title":"Preferences in AI: an overview","authors":"C Domshlak, E Hüllermeier, S Kaci, H Prade","year":"2011","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":29,"raw":"[Dung, 1995] P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell., 77:321- 358, 1995.","title":"On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games","authors":"P M Dung","year":"1995","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":30,"raw":"[Dunne and Bench-Capon, 2002] P. E. Dunne and T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Coherence in finite argument systems. Ar- tif. Intell., 141(1/2):187-203, 2002.","title":"Coherence in finite argument systems","authors":"P E Dunne, T J M Bench-Capon","year":"2002","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":31,"raw":"[Fazzinga et al., 2015] B. Fazzinga, S. Flesca, and F. Parisi. On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumenta- tion frameworks. ACM Trans. Comput. Log., 16(3):22:1- 22:39, 2015.","title":"On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks","authors":"B Fazzinga, S Flesca, F Parisi","year":"2015","venue":"ACM Trans. Comput. Log","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":32,"raw":"[Fazzinga et al., 2020] B. Fazzinga, S. Flesca, and F. Fur- faro. Revisiting the notion of extension over incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of IJCAI, pages 1712-1718, 2020.","title":"Revisiting the notion of extension over incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks","authors":"B Fazzinga, S Flesca, F Furfaro","year":"2020","venue":"Proc. of IJCAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/2020/237"},{"position":33,"raw":"[Fazzinga et al., 2022] B. Fazzinga, S. Flesca, and F. Fur- faro. Abstract argumentation frameworks with marginal probabilities. In Proc. of IJCAI, pages 2613-2619, 2022.","title":"Abstract argumentation frameworks with marginal probabilities","authors":"B Fazzinga, S Flesca, F Furfaro","year":"2022","venue":"Proc. of IJCAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/2022/362"},{"position":34,"raw":"[Fazzinga et al., 2023] B. Fazzinga, S. Flesca, and F. Fur- faro. Taking into account \"who said what\" in abstract argu- mentation: Complexity results. Artif. Intell., 318:103885, 2023.","title":"Taking into account \"who said what\" in abstract argumentation: Complexity results","authors":"B Fazzinga, S Flesca, F Furfaro","year":"2023","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":35,"raw":"[Gabbay et al., 2021] D. Gabbay, M. Giacomin, G. R. Simari, and M. Thimm, editors. Handbook of Formal Ar- gumentation. College Public., 2021.","title":"Handbook of Formal Argumentation","authors":"D Gabbay, M Giacomin, G","year":"2021","venue":null,"doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":36,"raw":"[Gelder et al., 1991] A. Van Gelder, K. A. Ross, and J. S. Schlipf. The well-founded semantics for general logic pro- grams. J. ACM, 38(3):620-650, 1991.","title":"The well-founded semantics for general logic programs","authors":"A Van Gelder, K A Ross, J S Schlipf","year":"1991","venue":"J. ACM","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":37,"raw":"[Gottifredi et al., 2018] S. Gottifredi, A. Cohen, A. Javier Garcia, and G. R. Simari. Characterizing acceptability se- mantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive at- tack and support relations. Art. Intell, 262:336-368, 2018.","title":"Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations","authors":"S Gottifredi, A Cohen, A Javier Garcia, G R Simari","year":"2018","venue":"Art. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":38,"raw":"[Kaci et al., 2018] S. Kaci, L. W. N. van der Torre, and S. Villata. Preference in abstract argumentation. In Proc. COMMA, pages 405-412, 2018.","title":"Preference in abstract argumentation","authors":"S Kaci, L W N Van Der Torre, S Villata","year":"2018","venue":"Proc. COMMA","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":39,"raw":"[Kleene, 2009] S. C. Kleene. Introduction to metamathemat- ics. Ishi Press, unstated edition, 2009.","title":"Introduction to metamathematics","authors":"S C Kleene","year":"2009","venue":null,"doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":40,"raw":"[Konieczny et al., 2015] S. Konieczny, P. Marquis, and S. Vesic. On supported inference and extension selection in abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of EC- SQARU, pages 49-59, 2015.","title":"On supported inference and extension selection in abstract argumentation frameworks","authors":"S Konieczny, P Marquis, S Vesic","year":"2015","venue":"Proc. of EC-SQARU","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":41,"raw":"[Li et al., 2011] H. Li, N. Oren, and T. J. Norman. Prob- abilistic argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of TAFA, pages 1-16, 2011.","title":"Probabilistic argumentation frameworks","authors":"H Li, N Oren, T J Norman","year":"2011","venue":"Proc. of TAFA","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":42,"raw":"[Libkin, 2016] L. Libkin. Sql's three-valued logic and cer- tain answers. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 41(1):1:1-1:28, 2016.","title":"Sql's three-valued logic and certain answers","authors":"L Libkin","year":"2016","venue":"ACM Trans. Database Syst","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":43,"raw":"[Lukasiewicz, 1920] J. Lukasiewicz. On three-valued logic. Ruch filozoficzny, 5(170-171), 1920.","title":"On three-valued logic","authors":"J Lukasiewicz","year":"1920","venue":"Ruch filozoficzny","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":44,"raw":"[Manlove, 2013] D. Manlove. Algorithmics of matching un- der preferences, volume 2. World Scientific, 2013.","title":"Algorithmics of matching under preferences","authors":"D Manlove","year":"2013","venue":null,"doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":45,"raw":"[Modgil and Prakken, 2013] S. Modgil and H. Prakken. A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artif. Intell., 195:361-397, 2013.","title":"A general account of argumentation with preferences","authors":"S Modgil, H Prakken","year":"2013","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":46,"raw":"[Nouioua and Risch, 2011] F. Nouioua and V. Risch. Argu- mentation frameworks with necessities. In Proc. of SUM, 2011.","title":"Argumentation frameworks with necessities","authors":"F Nouioua, V Risch","year":"2011","venue":"Proc. of SUM","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":47,"raw":"[Parisi and Grant, 2023] F. Parisi and J. Grant. On measur- ing inconsistency in definite and indefinite databases with denial constraints. Artif. Intell., 318:103884, 2023.","title":"On measuring inconsistency in definite and indefinite databases with denial constraints","authors":"F Parisi, J Grant","year":"2023","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":48,"raw":"[Pigozzi et al., 2016] G. Pigozzi, A. Tsoukiàs, and P. Viappi- ani. Preferences in artificial intelligence. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 77(3-4):361-401, 2016.","title":"Preferences in artificial intelligence","authors":"G Pigozzi, A Tsoukiàs, P","year":"2016","venue":"Ann. Math. Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":49,"raw":"[Rossi et al., 2011] F. Rossi, K. Brent Venable, and T. Walsh. A Short Introduction to Preferences: Between Artificial In- telligence and Social Choice. Synthesis Lectures on Arti- ficial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Clay- pool Publishers, 2011.","title":"A Short Introduction to Preferences: Between Artificial Intelligence and Social Choice","authors":"F Rossi, K Brent Venable, T Walsh","year":"2011","venue":null,"doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":50,"raw":"[Sakama and Inoue, 2000] C. Sakama and K. Inoue. Prior- itized logic programming and its application to common- sense reasoning. Artif. Intell., 123(1-2), 2000.","title":"Prioritized logic programming and its application to commonsense reasoning","authors":"C Sakama, K Inoue","year":"2000","venue":"Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":51,"raw":"[Sakama and Son, 2020] C. Sakama and T. C. Son. Epis- temic argumentation framework: Theory and computa- tion. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 69:1103-1126, 2020.","title":"Epistemic argumentation framework: Theory and computation","authors":"C Sakama, T C Son","year":"2020","venue":"J. Artif. Intell. Res","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":52,"raw":"[Santhanam et al., 2016] G. R. Santhanam, S. Basu, and V. G. Honavar. Representing and Reasoning with Qual- itative Preferences: Tools and Applications. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.","title":"Representing and Reasoning with Qualitative Preferences: Tools and Applications","authors":"G R Santhanam, S Basu, V G Honavar","year":null,"venue":"Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":53,"raw":"[Sedki and Yahi, 2016] K. Sedki and S. Yahi. Constrained value-based argumentation framework. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Process- ing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU), volume 611 of Communications in Com- puter and Information Science, pages 265-278, 2016.","title":"Constrained value-based argumentation framework","authors":"K Sedki, S Yahi","year":"2016","venue":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU)","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":54,"raw":"[Silva et al., 2020] R. Silva, S. Sá, and J. F. L. Alcântara. Semantics hierarchy in preference-based argumentation frameworks. In COMMA, pages 339-346, 2020.","title":"Semantics hierarchy in preference-based argumentation frameworks","authors":"R Silva, S Sá, J F L Alcântara","year":"2020","venue":"COMMA","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":55,"raw":"[Skiba et al., 2021] K. Skiba, T. Rienstra, M. Thimm, J. Heyninck, and G. Kern-Isberner. Ranking extensions in abstract argumentation. In Proc. of IJCAI, pages 2047- 2053, 2021.","title":"Ranking extensions in abstract argumentation","authors":"K Skiba, T Rienstra, M Thimm, J Heyninck, G Kern-Isberner","year":"2021","venue":"Proc. of IJCAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/2021/282"},{"position":56,"raw":"[Staworko et al., 2012] S. Staworko, J. Chomicki, and J. Marcinkowski. Prioritized repairing and consistent query answering in relational databases. Ann. Math. Ar- tif. Intell., 64(2-3):209-246, 2012.","title":"Prioritized repairing and consistent query answering in relational databases","authors":"S Staworko, J Chomicki, J Marcinkowski","year":"2012","venue":"Ann. Math. Artif. Intell","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":57,"raw":"[Wakaki, 2015] T. Wakaki. Preference-based argumentation built from prioritized logic programming. J. Log. Comput., 25(2):251-301, 2015.","title":"Preference-based argumentation built from prioritized logic programming","authors":"T Wakaki","year":"2015","venue":"J. Log. Comput","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null}],"license_note":"Copyright International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence."}