Proceedings

Tool- and Domain-Agnostic Parameterization of Style Transfer Effects Leveraging Pretrained Perceptual Metrics

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 1208-1216.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/167

Abstract

Current deep learning techniques for style transfer would not be optimal for design support since their "one-shot" transfer does not fit exploratory design processes. To overcome this gap, we propose parametric transcription, which transcribes an end-to-end style transfer effect into parameter values of specific transformations available in an existing content editing tool. With this approach, users can imitate the style of a reference sample in the tool that they are familiar with and thus can easily continue further exploration by manipulating the parameters. To enable this, we introduce a framework that utilizes an existing pretrained model for style transfer to calculate a perceptual style distance to the reference sample and uses black-box optimization to find the parameters that minimize this distance. Our experiments with various third-party tools, such as Instagram and Blender, show that our framework can effectively leverage deep learning techniques for computational design support.

  1. [Akiba et al., 2019] T. Akiba, S. Sano, et al. Optuna: A next- generation hyperparameter optimization framework. In ACM KDD, 2019.
  2. [Brochu et al., 2007] E. Brochu, N. Freitas, and A. Ghosh. Active preference learning with discrete choice data. In NeurIPS, 2007.
  3. [Chen et al., 2018] K. Chen, C Choy, et al. Text2Shape: gen- erating shapes from natural language by learning joint em- beddings. In ACCV, 2018.
  4. [Chen et al., 2019] H. Chen, K. Hui, et al. BeautyGlow: on- demand makeup transfer framework with reversible gener- ative network. In IEEE/CVF CVPR, 2019.
  5. [Dalí, 1970] S. Dalí. Dali by Dali. Abrams, New York, NY, 1970.
  6. [Doersch, 2016] C. Doersch. Tutorial on variational autoen- coders. arXiv, abs/1606.05908, 2016.
  7. [Fukamizu et al., 2019] K. Fukamizu, M. Kondo, and R. Sakamoto. Generation high resolution 3D model from natural language by GAN. arXiv, abs/1901.07165, 2019.
  8. [Gero, 1990] J. Gero. Design prototypes: A knowledge rep- resentation schema for design. AI Mag., 11(4), 1990.
  9. [Goodfellow et al., 2014] I.
  10. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, et al. Generative adversarial nets. In NeurIPS, 2014.
  11. [Gu et al., 2019] Q. Gu, G. Wang, et al. LADN: local ad- versarial disentangling network for facial makeup and de- makeup. In IEEE ICCV, 2019.
  12. [Guo et al., 2019] J. Guo, Z. Qian, et al. MulGAN: facial attribute editing by exemplar. arXiv, abs/1912.12396, 2019.
  13. [Hartmann et al., 2008] B. Hartmann, L. Yu, et al. Design as exploration: creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning. In ACM UIST, 2008.
  14. [He et al., 2019] Z. He, W. Zuo, et al. AttGAN: facial at- tribute editing by only changing what you want. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 28(11), 2019.
  15. [Holden et al., 2017] D. Holden, I. Habibie, et al. Fast neural style transfer for motion data. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 37(4), 2017.
  16. [Hu et al., 2018] Y. Hu, H. He, et al. Exposure: A white-box photo post-processing framework. ACM Trans. Graph., 37(2), 2018.
  17. [Hu et al., 2019] Y. Hu, J. Dorsey, and H. Rushmeier. A novel framework for inverse procedural texture modeling. ACM Trans. Graph., 38(6), 2019.
  18. [Huang et al., 2018] X. Huang, M. Liu, et al. Multimodal unsupervised image-to-image translation. In ECCV, 2018.
  19. [Jing et al., 2020] Y. Jing, Y. Yang, et al. Neural style transfer: A review. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 26(11), 2020.
  20. [Kingma and Dhariwal, 2018] D. Kingma and P. Dhariwal. Glow: generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. In NeurIPS, 2018.
  21. [Koyama and Igarashi, 2018] Y. Koyama and T. Igarashi. Computational design with crowds. In Computational In- teraction. Oxford University Press, 2018.
  22. [Koyama et al., 2020] Y. Koyama, I. Sato, and M. Goto. Se- quential gallery for interactive visual design optimization. ACM Trans. Graph., 39(4), 2020.
  23. [Kühnel et al., 2018] L. Kühnel, T. Fletcher, et al. Latent space non-linear statistics. arXiv, abs/1805.07632, 2018.
  24. [Lee et al., 2018] H. Lee, H. Tseng, et al. Diverse image- to-image translation via disentangled representations. In ECCV, 2018.
  25. [Li et al., 2019] X. Li, S. Liu, et al. Learning linear trans- formations for fast image and video style transfer. In IEEE/CVF CVPR, 2019.
  26. [Liu et al., 2017] M. Liu, T. Breuel, and J. Kautz. Unsuper- vised image-to-image translation networks. In NeurIPS, 2017.
  27. [Luan et al., 2017] F. Luan, S. Paris, et al. Deep photo style transfer. In IEEE/CVF CVPR, 2017.
  28. [Marks et al., 1997] J. Marks, B. Andalman, et al. Design galleries: a general approach to setting parameters for com- puter graphics and animation. In SIGGRAPH, 1997.
  29. [Omiya et al., 2019] M. Omiya, Y. Horiuchi, et al. Optimization-based data generation for photo enhancement. In CVPR NITRE Workshop, 2019.
  30. [Reed et al., 2016] S. Reed, Z. Akata, et al. Generative adver- sarial text to image synthesis. In ICML, 2016.
  31. [Ryokai et al., 2004] K. Ryokai, S. Marti, and H. Ishii. I/O brush: drawing with everyday objects as ink. In ACM CHI, 2004.
  32. [Salter and Fawcett, 1993] K. Salter and R. Fawcett. The ART test of interaction: A robust and powerful rank test of interaction in factorial models. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 22(1), 1993.
  33. [Savva et al., 2015] M. Savva, A. Chang, and P. Hanrahan. Semantically-enriched 3d models for common-sense knowl- edge. In CVPR VMC Workshop, 2015.
  34. [Sedlmair et al., 2014] M. Sedlmair, C. Heinzl, et al. Visual parameter space analysis: A conceptual framework. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 20(12), 2014.
  35. [Shahriari et al., 2016] B. Shahriari, K. Swersky, et al. Taking the human out of the loop: A review of bayesian optimiza- tion. Proc. IEEE, 104(1), 2016.
  36. [Shi et al., 2020] L. Shi, B. Li, et al. MATch: differentiable material graphs for procedural material capture. ACM Trans. Graph., 39(6), 2020.
  37. [Shneiderman, 2007] B. Shneiderman. Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun. ACM, 50(12), 2007.
  38. [Takagi, 2001] H. Takagi. Interactive evolutionary compu- tation: fusion of the capabilities of ec optimization and human evaluation. Proc. IEEE, 89(9), 2001.
  39. [Talton et al., 2009] J. Talton, D. Gibson, et al. Exploratory modeling with collaborative design spaces. ACM Trans. Graph., 28(5), 2009.
  40. [Talton et al., 2011] J. Talton, Y. Lou, et al. Metropolis pro- cedural modeling. ACM Trans. Graph., 30(2), 2011.
  41. [Terry and Mynatt, 2002] M. Terry and E. Mynatt. Side views: persistent, on-demand previews for open-ended tasks. In ACM UIST, 2002.
  42. [Tweedie, 1995] L. Tweedie. Interactive visualisation arti- facts: How can abstractions inform design? In BCS HCI, 1995.
  43. [Xiao et al., 2018] T. Xiao, J. Hong, and J. Ma. ELEGANT: exchanging latent encodings with GAN for transferring multiple face attributes. In ECCV, 2018.
  44. [Yaniv et al., 2019] J. Yaniv, Y. Newman, and A. Shamir. The face of art: landmark detection and geometric style in por- traits. ACM Trans. Graph., 38(4), 2019.
  45. [Yümer and Mitra, 2016] M. Yümer and N. Mitra. Spectral style transfer for human motion between independent ac- tions. ACM Trans. Graph., 35(4), 2016.
  46. [Zhang et al., 2017] H. Zhang, T. Xu, and H. Li. StackGAN: text to photo-realistic image synthesis with stacked genera- tive adversarial networks. In IEEE ICCV, 2017.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards