{"type":"ScholarlyArticle","title":"Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Graphs: Axioms and Semantics","authors":[{"name":"Leila Amgoud","slug":"leila-amgoud","given":"Leila","family":"Amgoud","affiliation":"CNRS -IRIT , France"},{"name":"Jonathan Ben-Naim","slug":"jonathan-ben-naim","given":"Jonathan","family":"Ben-Naim","affiliation":"CNRS -IRIT , France"}],"abstract":"The paper studies how arguments can be evaluated in weighted bipolar argumentation graphs (i.e., graphs whose arguments have basic weights and may be supported and attacked). It introduces principles that an evaluation method (or semantics) would satisfy,  analyzes existing semantics  with respect to them, and finally proposes a new semantics for the class of non-maximal acyclic graphs.","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2018/720","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2018/720","pdf":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2018/0720.pdf","markdown":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2018/720.md","bibtex":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2018/bibtex/720","volume":{"slug":"2018","title":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","short_title":"IJCAI 2018","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2018/","year":2018,"location":"Stockholm","dates":"13-19 July 2018","editors":"Jérôme Lang","isbn":"978-0-9992411-2-7","publisher":"International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization","doi_prefix":"10.24963/ijcai.2018"},"section":"Sister Conferences Best Papers","track":"Best Sister Conferences","number":720,"pages":{"first":5194,"last":5198},"keywords":["Agent-based and Multi-agent Systems: Agreement Technologies: Argumentation","Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Computational Models of Argument"],"videos":[],"references":[{"position":1,"raw":"[Amgoud and Ben-Naim, 2016a] Leila Amgoud and Jonathan Ben-Naim. Axiomatic foundations of accept- ability semantics. In Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR, pages 2-11, 2016.","title":"Axiomatic foundations of acceptability semantics","authors":"Ben-Naim ; Amgoud, Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim","year":"2016","venue":"Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":2,"raw":"[Amgoud and Ben-Naim, 2016b] Leila Amgoud and Jonathan Ben-Naim. Evaluation of arguments from support relations: Axioms and semantics. In Proc. of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, pages 900-906, 2016.","title":"Evaluation of arguments from support relations: Axioms and semantics","authors":"Ben-Naim ; Amgoud, Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim","year":"2016","venue":"Proc. of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/2016/132"},{"position":3,"raw":"[Baroni et al., 2015] Pietro Baroni, Marco Romano, Francesca Toni, Marco Aurisicchio, and Giorgio Bertanza. Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quan- titative argumentation. Argument & Computation, 6(1):24-49, 2015.","title":"Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation","authors":"Pietro Baroni, Marco Romano, Francesca Toni, Marco Aurisicchio, Giorgio Bertanza","year":"2015","venue":"Argument & Computation","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":4,"raw":"[Baroni et al., 2018] Pietro Baroni, Antonio Rago, and Francesca Toni. How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation? In Proc. of the 32 Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, 2018.","title":"How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation?","authors":"Baroni","year":"2018","venue":"Proc. of the 32 Conference on Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":5,"raw":"[Boella et al., 2010] Guido Boella, Dov M. Gabbay, Leen- dert van der Torre, and Serena Villata. Support in ab- stract argumentation. In Proc. of COMMA, pages 111- 122, 2010.","title":"Support in abstract argumentation","authors":"Guido Boella, Dov M Gabbay, Serena Leendert Van Der Torre, Villata","year":"2010","venue":"Proc. of COMMA","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":6,"raw":"[Brewka and Woltran, 2010] Gerhard Brewka and Stefan Woltran. Abstract dialectical frameworks. In Proc. of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR, 2010.","title":"Abstract dialectical frameworks","authors":"Woltran Brewka, Gerhard Brewka, Stefan Woltran","year":"2010","venue":"Proc. of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":7,"raw":"[Cayrol and Lagasquie-Schiex, 2005a] Claudette Cayrol and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of the Eu- ropean Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Ap- proaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, ECSQARU, pages 366-377, 2005.","title":"Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks","authors":"Lagasquie-Schiex ; Cayrol, Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex","year":"2005","venue":"Proc. of the European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":8,"raw":"[Cayrol and Lagasquie-Schiex, 2005b] Claudette Cayrol and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of the European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, ECSQARU, pages 378-389, 2005.","title":"On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks","authors":"Lagasquie-Schiex ; Cayrol, Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex","year":"2005","venue":"Proc. of the European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, ECSQARU","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":9,"raw":"[Dung, 1995] P. M. Dung. On the Acceptability of Argu- ments and its Fundamental Role in Non-Monotonic Rea- soning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artifi- cial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.","title":"On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games","authors":"P M Dung","year":"1995","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":10,"raw":"[Evripidou and Toni, 2014] Valentinos Evripidou and Francesca Toni. Quaestio-it.com: a social intelli- gent debating platform. Journal of Decision Systems, 23(3):333-349, 2014.","title":"Valentinos Evripidou and Francesca Toni. Quaestio-it.com: a social intelligent debating platform","authors":"Toni Evripidou","year":"2014","venue":"Journal of Decision Systems","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":11,"raw":"[Mossakowski and Neuhaus, 2016] Till Mossakowski and Fabian Neuhaus. Bipolar weighted argumentation graphs. CoRR, abs/1611.08572, 2016.","title":"Till Mossakowski and Fabian Neuhaus. Bipolar weighted argumentation graphs","authors":"Neuhaus Mossakowski","year":"2016","venue":null,"doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":12,"raw":"[Nouioua and Risch, 2010] Farid Nouioua and Vincent Risch. Bipolar argumentation frameworks with special- ized supports. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI, pages 215-218, 2010.","title":"Bipolar argumentation frameworks with specialized supports","authors":"Risch Nouioua, Farid Nouioua, Vincent Risch","year":"2010","venue":"Proc. of the Int. Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":13,"raw":"[Oren and Norman, 2008] Nir Oren and Timothy Norman. Semantics for evidence-based argumentation. In Proc. of the International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA, pages 276-284, 2008.","title":"Semantics for evidence-based argumentation","authors":"Oren, Norman ;, Nir Oren, Timothy Norman","year":"2008","venue":"Proc. of the International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":14,"raw":"[Pazienza et al., 2017] Andrea Pazienza, Stefano Ferilli, and Floriana Esposito. On the gradual acceptability of argu- ments in bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks with degrees of trust. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Foundations of Intelligent Systems ISMIS, pages 195-204, 2017.","title":"On the gradual acceptability of arguments in bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks with degrees of trust","authors":"Andrea Pazienza, Stefano Ferilli, Floriana Esposito","year":"2017","venue":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Foundations of Intelligent Systems ISMIS","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":15,"raw":"[Rago et al., 2016] Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni, Marco Aurisicchio, and Pietro Baroni. Discontinuity-free deci- sion support with quantitative argumentation debates. In Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR, pages 63-73, 2016.","title":"Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates","authors":"Rago","year":"2016","venue":"Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null}],"license_note":"Copyright International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence."}