{"type":"ScholarlyArticle","title":"Acceptability Semantics for Weighted Argumentation Frameworks","authors":[{"name":"Leila Amgoud","slug":"leila-amgoud","given":"Leila","family":"Amgoud","affiliation":"IRIT , CNRS - Université de Toulouse , France"},{"name":"Jonathan Ben-Naim","slug":"jonathan-ben-naim","given":"Jonathan","family":"Ben-Naim","affiliation":"IRIT , CNRS - Université de Toulouse , France"},{"name":"Dragan Doder","slug":"dragan-doder","given":"Dragan","family":"Doder","affiliation":"Faculty of Mechanical Engineering , University of Belgrade , Serbia"},{"name":"Srdjan Vesic","slug":"srdjan-vesic","given":"Srdjan","family":"Vesic","affiliation":"CRIL , CNRS - Université d'Artois , France"}],"abstract":"The paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, where \r\neach argument has a basic strength, and may be attacked by other arguments. It starts \r\nby defining a set of principles, each of which is a property that a semantics could \r\nsatisfy. It provides the first formal analysis and comparison of existing semantics. \r\nFinally, it defines three novel semantics that satisfy more principles than existing ones.","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2017/9","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/9","pdf":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/0009.pdf","markdown":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/9.md","bibtex":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/bibtex/9","volume":{"slug":"2017","title":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","short_title":"IJCAI 2017","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/","year":2017,"location":"Melbourne, Australia","dates":"19-25 August 2017","editors":"Carles Sierra","isbn":"978-0-9992411-0-3","publisher":"International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization","doi_prefix":"10.24963/ijcai.2017"},"section":"Agent-based and Multi-agent Systems","track":"Main track","number":9,"pages":{"first":56,"last":62},"keywords":["Agent-based and Multi-agent Systems: Agreement Technologies: Argumentation","Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and Logic: Computational models of Argument"],"videos":[],"references":[{"position":1,"raw":"[Amgoud and Ben-Naim, 2013] Leila Amgoud and Jonathan Ben-Naim. Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. In SUM'13, pages 134-147, 2013.","title":"Leila Amgoud and Jonathan Ben-Naim. Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks","authors":"Ben-Naim Amgoud","year":"2013","venue":"SUM'13","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":2,"raw":"[Amgoud and Ben-Naim, 2016a] Leila Amgoud and Jonathan Ben-Naim. Axiomatic foundations of accept- ability semantics. In KR'16, pages 2-11, 2016.","title":"Axiomatic foundations of acceptability semantics","authors":"Ben-Naim ; Amgoud, Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim","year":"2016","venue":"KR'","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":3,"raw":"[Amgoud and Ben-Naim, 2016b] Leila Amgoud and Jonathan Ben-Naim. Evaluation of arguments from support relations: Axioms and semantics. In IJCAI'16, pages 900-906, 2016.","title":"Evaluation of arguments from support relations: Axioms and semantics","authors":"Ben-Naim ; Amgoud, Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim","year":"2016","venue":"IJCAI'16","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/2016/132"},{"position":4,"raw":"[Amgoud and Cayrol, 2002] Leila Amgoud and Claudette Cayrol. A reasoning model based on the production of ac- ceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 34(1-3):197-215, 2002.","title":"Leila Amgoud and Claudette Cayrol. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments","authors":"Cayrol Amgoud","year":"2002","venue":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":5,"raw":"[Amgoud et al., 2017] Leila Amgoud, Elise Bonzon, Marco Correia, Jorge Cruz, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, João Leite, Alexis Martin, Nicolas Maudet, and Srdjan Vesic. A note on the uniqueness of models in social abstract argumentation. CoRR, abs/1705.03381, 2017.","title":"A note on the uniqueness of models in social abstract argumentation","authors":"Leila Amgoud, Elise Bonzon, Marco Correia, Jorge Cruz, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, João Leite, Alexis Martin, Nicolas Maudet, Srdjan Vesic","year":"2017","venue":null,"doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":6,"raw":"[Baroni and Giacomin, 2007] Pietro Baroni and Massim- iliano Giacomin. On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artificial Intel- ligence, 171(10-15):675-700, 2007.","title":"Pietro Baroni and Massimiliano Giacomin. On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics","authors":"Giacomin Baroni","year":"2007","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":7,"raw":"[Baroni et al., 2015] Pietro Baroni, Marco Romano, Francesca Toni, Marco Aurisicchio, and Giorgio Bertanza. Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quan- titative argumentation. Argument & Computation, 6(1):24-49, 2015.","title":"Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation","authors":"Pietro Baroni, Marco Romano, Francesca Toni, Marco Aurisicchio, Giorgio Bertanza","year":"2015","venue":"Argument & Computation","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":8,"raw":"[Bench-Capon, 2003] Trevor Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumenta- tion frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3):429-448, 2003.","title":"Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks","authors":"Trevor Bench-Capon","year":"2003","venue":"Journal of Logic and Computation","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":9,"raw":"[Benferhat et al., 1993] Salem Benferhat, Didier Dubois, and Henri Prade. Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In UAI'93, pages 411- 419, 1993.","title":"Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases","authors":"Benferhat","year":"1993","venue":"UAI'93","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":10,"raw":"[Besnard and Hunter, 2001] Philippe Besnard and Anthony Hunter. A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Ar- tificial Intelligence, 128(1-2):203-235, 2001.","title":"A logic-based theory of deductive arguments","authors":"Philippe Besnard, Anthony Hunter","year":"2001","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":11,"raw":"[Bonzon et al., 2016] Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, and Nicolas Maudet. A com- parative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In AAAI'16, 2016.","title":"A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation","authors":"Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, Nicolas Maudet","year":"2016","venue":"AAAI'16","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":12,"raw":"[Cayrol et al., 2010] Claudette Cayrol, Caroline Devred, and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. Acceptability seman- tics accounting for strength of attacks in argumentation. In ECAI'10, pages 995-996, 2010.","title":"Acceptability semantics accounting for strength of attacks in argumentation","authors":"Claudette Cayrol, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex","year":"2010","venue":"ECAI'10","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":13,"raw":"[da Costa Pereira et al., 2011] Célia da Costa Pereira, An- drea Tettamanzi, and Serena Villata. Changing one's mind: Erase or rewind? In IJCAI'11, pages 164-171, 2011.","title":"Célia da Costa Pereira, Andrea Tettamanzi, and Serena Villata. Changing one's mind: Erase or rewind?","authors":"Costa Da, Pereira","year":"2011","venue":"IJCAI'11","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":14,"raw":"[Dubois and Prade, 1995] Didier Dubois and Henri Prade. Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In (IJCAI'95), pages 1924-1930, 1995.","title":"Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory","authors":"Prade Dubois, Didier Dubois, Henri Prade","year":"1995","venue":"IJCAI'95)","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/1995/247"},{"position":15,"raw":"[Dubois et al., 2008] Didier Dubois, Hélène Fargier, and Jean-Franc ¸ois Bonnefon. On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features. Jour- nal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 32:385-417, 2008.","title":"On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features","authors":"Didier Dubois, Hélène Fargier, Jean-Franc ¸ois Bonnefon","year":"2008","venue":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":16,"raw":"[Dung, 1995] Phan Minh Dung. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Ar- tificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.","title":"On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games","authors":"Phan Minh, Dung","year":"1995","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":17,"raw":"[Dunne et al., 2010] Paul Dunne, Diego Martinez, Alejandro Garcia, and Guillermo Simari. Computation with varied- strength attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks. In COMMA'10, pages 207-218, 2010.","title":"Computation with variedstrength attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks","authors":"Paul Dunne, Diego Martinez, Alejandro Garcia, Guillermo Simari","year":"2010","venue":"COMMA'10","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":18,"raw":"[Dunne et al., 2011] Paul Dunne, Anthony Hunter, Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons, and Michael Wooldridge. Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algo- rithms, and complexity results. Artificial Intelligence, 175(2):457-486, 2011.","title":"Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results","authors":"Paul Dunne, Anthony Hunter, Peter Mcburney, Simon Parsons, Michael Wooldridge","year":"2011","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":19,"raw":"[Gabbay and Rodrigues, 2015] Dov M. Gabbay and Odi- naldo Rodrigues. Equilibrium states in numerical argu- mentation networks. Logica Universalis, 9(4):411-473, 2015.","title":"Equilibrium states in numerical argumentation networks","authors":"Dov M Gabbay, Odinaldo Rodrigues","year":"2015","venue":"Logica Universalis","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":20,"raw":"[Hunter, 2013] Anthony Hunter. A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 54(1):47-81, 2013.","title":"A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments","authors":"Anthony Hunter","year":"2013","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":21,"raw":"[Leite and Martins, 2011] João Leite and João Martins. So- cial abstract argumentation. In IJCAI'11, pages 2287- 2292, 2011.","title":"Social abstract argumentation","authors":"João Leite, João Martins","year":"2011","venue":"IJCAI'11","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":"/proceedings/2011/381"},{"position":22,"raw":"[Li et al., 2011] Hengfei Li, Nir Oren, and Timothy J. Nor- man. Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In TAFA'11, pages 1-16, 2011.","title":"Probabilistic argumentation frameworks","authors":"Hengfei Li, Nir Oren, Timothy J","year":"2011","venue":"TAFA'11","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":23,"raw":"[Modgil, 2009] Sanjay Modgil. Reasoning about prefer- ences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelli- gence, 173(9-10):901-934, 2009.","title":"Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks","authors":"Sanjay Modgil","year":"2009","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":24,"raw":"[Rago et al., 2016] Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni, Marco Aurisicchio, and Pietro Baroni. Discontinuity-free deci- sion support with quantitative argumentation debates. In KR'16, pages 63-73, 2016.","title":"Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates","authors":"Rago","year":"2016","venue":"KR'","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":25,"raw":"[Shapley, 1953] Lloyd Shapley. A values for n-person games. H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, eds., Contributions to the theory of games, vol. II. Annal of Mathematics Stud- ies, (28), 1953.","title":"A values for n-person games","authors":"Lloyd Shapley","year":"1953","venue":"Contributions to the theory of games","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":26,"raw":"[Thimm, 2012] Matthias Thimm. A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation. In ECAI'12, pages 750-755, 2012.","title":"A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation","authors":"Matthias Thimm","year":"2012","venue":"ECAI'12","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null}],"license_note":"Copyright International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence."}