{"type":"ScholarlyArticle","title":"Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Extended Abstract","authors":[{"name":"Stephane Airiau","slug":"stephane-airiau","given":"Stephane","family":"Airiau","affiliation":"LAMSADE , Université Paris-Dauphine"},{"name":"Elise Bonzon","slug":"elise-bonzon","given":"Elise","family":"Bonzon","affiliation":"LIPADE , Université Paris Descartes"},{"name":"Ulle Endriss","slug":"ulle-endriss","given":"Ulle","family":"Endriss","affiliation":"ILLC , University of Amsterdam"},{"name":"Nicolas Maudet","slug":"nicolas-maudet","given":"Nicolas","family":"Maudet","affiliation":"LIP6 , UPMC Université Paris 6 , Sorbonne Universités 1"},{"name":"Julien Rossit","slug":"julien-rossit","given":"Julien","family":"Rossit","affiliation":"LIPADE , Université Paris Descartes"}],"abstract":"We review a recently introduced model in which each of a number of agents is endowed with an abstract argumentation framework reflecting her individual views regarding a given set of arguments. A question arising in this context is whether the diversity of views observed in such a situation is consistent with the assumption that every individual argumentation framework is induced by a combination of, first, some basic factual information and, second, the personal preferences of the agent concerned. We treat this question of rationalisability of a profile as an algorithmic problem and identify tractable and intractable cases. This is useful for understanding what types of profiles can reasonably be expected to occur in a multiagent system.","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2017/665","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/665","pdf":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/0665.pdf","markdown":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/665.md","bibtex":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/bibtex/665","volume":{"slug":"2017","title":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","short_title":"IJCAI 2017","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/","year":2017,"location":"Melbourne, Australia","dates":"19-25 August 2017","editors":"Carles Sierra","isbn":"978-0-9992411-0-3","publisher":"International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization","doi_prefix":"10.24963/ijcai.2017"},"section":"Best Sister Conferences","track":"Best Sister Conferences","number":665,"pages":{"first":4776,"last":4780},"keywords":["Artificial Intelligence: knowledge representation and reasoning","Artificial Intelligence: multi-agent systems"],"videos":[],"references":[{"position":1,"raw":"[Airiau et al., 2016] Stéphane Airiau, Elise Bonzon, Ulle Endriss, Nicolas Maudet, and Julien Rossit. Rationalisa- tion of profiles of abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Au- tonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2016). IFAAMAS, 2016.","title":"Rationalisation of profiles of abstract argumentation frameworks","authors":"Stéphane Airiau, Elise Bonzon, Ulle Endriss, Nicolas Maudet, Julien Rossit","year":"2016","venue":"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2016)","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":2,"raw":"[Bench-Capon, 2003] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Persua- sion in practical argument using value-based argumen- tation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3):429-448, 2003.","title":"Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks","authors":"J M Trevor, Bench-Capon","year":"2003","venue":"Journal of Logic and Computation","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":3,"raw":"[Bodanza and Auday, 2009] Gustavo A. Bodanza and Marcelo R. Auday. Social argument justification: Some mechanisms and conditions for their coincidence. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Sym- bolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU-2009). Springer-Verlag, 2009.","title":"Social argument justification: Some mechanisms and conditions for their coincidence","authors":"Gustavo A Bodanza, Marcelo R Auday","year":"2009","venue":"Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU-2009)","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":4,"raw":"[Bodanza et al., 2017] Gustavo M. Bodanza, Fernando A. Tohmé, and Marcelo R. Auday. Collective argumenta- tion: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks. Argument & Computation, 2017. In press.","title":"Collective argumentation: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks","authors":"Gustavo M Bodanza, Fernando A Tohmé, Marcelo R Auday","year":"2017","venue":"Argument & Computation","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":5,"raw":"[Coste-Marquis et al., 2007] Sylvie Coste-Marquis, Caro- line Devred, Sébastien Konieczny, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, and Pierre Marquis. On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10-15):730-753, 2007.","title":"On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems","authors":"Sylvie Coste-Marquis, Caroline Devred, Sébastien Konieczny, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Pierre Marquis","year":"2007","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":6,"raw":"[Dung, 1995] Phan Minh Dung. On the acceptability of ar- guments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic rea- soning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-358, 1995.","title":"On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games","authors":"Phan Minh, Dung","year":"1995","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":7,"raw":"[Dunne et al., 2012] Paul E. Dunne, Pierre Marquis, and Michael Wooldridge. Argument aggregation: Basic ax- ioms and complexity results. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Models of Ar- gument (COMMA-2012). IOS Press, 2012.","title":"Argument aggregation: Basic ax-ioms and complexity results","authors":"Paul E Dunne, Pierre Marquis, Michael Wooldridge","year":"2012","venue":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA-2012)","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":8,"raw":"[Dunne et al., 2014] Paul E. Dunne, Wolfgang Dvoȓák, Thomas Linsbichler, and Stefan Woltran. Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation. In Pro- ceedings of the 14th International Conference on Prin- ciples of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR- 2014), 2014.","title":"Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation","authors":"Paul E Dunne, Wolfgang Dvoȓák, Thomas Linsbichler, Stefan Woltran","year":"2014","venue":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":9,"raw":"[Endriss and Grandi, 2017] Ulle Endriss and Umberto Grandi. Graph aggregation. Artificial Intelligence, 245:86-114, 2017.","title":"Graph aggregation","authors":"Grandi Endriss, Ulle Endriss, Umberto Grandi","year":"2017","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":10,"raw":"[Hochbaum and Naor, 1994] Dorit S. Hochbaum and Joseph Naor. Simple and fast algorithms for linear and integer programs with two variables per inequality. SIAM Journal on Computing, 23(6):1179-1192, 1994.","title":"Simple and fast algorithms for linear and integer programs with two variables per inequality","authors":"Dorit S Hochbaum, Joseph Naor","year":"1994","venue":"SIAM Journal on Computing","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":11,"raw":"[Karp, 1972] Richard M. Karp. Reducibility among com- binatorial problems. In Proceedings of a Symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations. Plenum Press, 1972.","title":"Reducibility among combinatorial problems","authors":"Richard M Karp","year":"1972","venue":"Proceedings of a Symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":12,"raw":"[Pulfrey-Taylor et al., 2011] Sarah Pulfrey-Taylor, Emily Henthorn, Katie Atkinson, Adam Wyner, and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Populating an online consultation tool. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX-2011). IOS Press, 2011.","title":"Populating an online consultation tool","authors":"Sarah Pulfrey-Taylor, Emily Henthorn, Katie Atkinson, Adam Wyner, Trevor J M Bench-Capon","year":"2011","venue":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX-2011)","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null},{"position":13,"raw":"[Tohmé et al., 2008] Fernando A. Tohmé, Gustavo A. Bo- danza, and Guillermo R. Simari. Aggregation of attack relations: A social-choice theoretical analysis of defea- sibility criteria. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS-2008). Springer-Verlag, 2008.","title":"Aggregation of attack relations: A social-choice theoretical analysis of defeasibility criteria","authors":"Fernando A Tohmé, Gustavo A Bodanza, Guillermo R Simari","year":"2008","venue":"Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS-2008)","doi":null,"url":null,"internal_url":null}],"license_note":"Copyright International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence."}