Measuring Performance of Peer Prediction Mechanisms Using Replicator Dynamics
Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Pages 2611-2616.
Abstract
Peer prediction is the problem of eliciting private, but correlated, information from agents. By rewarding an agent for the amount that their report predicts that of another agent, mechanisms can promote effort and truthful reports. A common concern in peer prediction is the multiplicity of equilibria, perhaps including high-payoff equilibria that reveal no information. Rather than assume agents counter-speculate and compute an equilibrium, we adopt replicator dynamics as a model for population learning. We take the size of the basin of attraction of the truthful equilibrium as a proxy for the robustness of truthful play. We study different mechanism designs, using models estimated from real peer evaluations in several massive on-line courses. Among other observations, we confirm that recent mechanisms present a significant improvement in robustness over earlier approaches.
@inproceedings{ijcai2016p371,
title = {Measuring Performance of Peer Prediction Mechanisms Using Replicator Dynamics},
author = {Shnayder, Victor and Frongillo, Rafael M. and Parkes, David C.},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-16}},
publisher = {AAAI Press / International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence},
editor = {Subbarao Kambhampati},
pages = {2611--2616},
year = {2016},
month = {7},
url = {https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2016/371},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - Measuring Performance of Peer Prediction Mechanisms Using Replicator Dynamics AU - Shnayder, Victor AU - Frongillo, Rafael M. AU - Parkes, David C. T2 - Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-16 PB - AAAI Press / International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence PY - 2016 SP - 2611 EP - 2616 UR - https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2016/371 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents: