Proceedings

Manipulation in Group Argument Evaluation

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Pages 121-125.

https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-032

Abstract

Given an argumentation framework and a group of agents, the individuals may have divergent opinions on the status of the arguments. If the group needsto reach a common position on the argumentation framework, the question is how the individual evaluations can be mapped into a collective one. Thisproblem has been recently investigated by Caminada and Pigozzi. In this paper, we investigate the behaviour of two of such operators from a socialchoice-theoretic point of view. In particular, we study under which conditions these operators are Pareto optimal and whether they are manipulable.

Martin Caminada, Gabriella Pigozzi, and Mikolaj Podlaszewski. 2011. Manipulation in Group Argument Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-11. IJCAI, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-032
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards