{"type":"ScholarlyArticle","title":"A Characterisation of Strategy-Proofness for Grounded Argumentation Semantics","authors":[{"name":"Iyad Rahwan","slug":"iyad-rahwan","given":"Iyad","family":"Rahwan","affiliation":""},{"name":"Kate Larson","slug":"kate-larson","given":"Kate","family":"Larson","affiliation":""},{"name":"Fernando A. Tohmé","slug":"fernando-a-tohme","given":"Fernando A.","family":"Tohmé","affiliation":""}],"abstract":"Recently, Argumentation Mechanism Design (ArgMD) was introduced as a new paradigm for studying argumentation among self-interested agents using game-theoretic techniques. Preliminary results showed a condition under which a direct mechanism based on Dung's grounded semantics is strategy-proof (i.e. truth enforcing). But these early results dealt with a highly restricted form of agent preferences, and assumed agents can only hide, but not lie about, arguments. In this paper, we characterise strategy-proofness under grounded semantics for a more realistic preference class (namely, focal arguments). We also provide the first analysis of the case where agents can lie.Iyad Rahwan, Kate Larson, Fernando Tohmé","doi":null,"url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2009/51","pdf":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2009/0051.pdf","markdown":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2009/51.md","bibtex":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2009/bibtex/51","volume":{"slug":"2009","title":"Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","short_title":"IJCAI 2009","url":"https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2009/","year":2009,"location":"Pasadena, California, USA","dates":"","editors":"Hiroaki Kitano","isbn":"","publisher":"International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence","doi_prefix":""},"section":null,"track":"","number":51,"pages":{"first":251,"last":255},"keywords":[],"videos":[],"references":[],"license_note":"Copyright International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence."}