Dialectical Abstract Argumentation: A Characterization of the Marking Criterion
Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. .
Abstract
This article falls within the field of abstract argumentation frameworks. In particular, we focus on the study of frameworks using a proof procedure based on dialectical trees. These trees rely on a marking procedure to determine the warrant status of their root argument. Thus, our objective is to formulate rationality postulates to characterize the marking criterion over dialectical trees. The behavior of the marking procedure is closely tied to the alteration of trees, which is the keystone of any model of change based on dialectical argumentation. Hence, the results achieved in this work will benefit research on dynamics in argumentation.
@inproceedings{ijcai2009p153,
title = {Dialectical Abstract Argumentation: A Characterization of the Marking Criterion},
author = {Rotstein, Nicolas and Moguillansky, Martin and Simari, Guillermo},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-09}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence},
editor = {Hiroaki Kitano},
year = {2009},
url = {https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2009/153},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - Dialectical Abstract Argumentation: A Characterization of the Marking Criterion AU - Rotstein, Nicolas AU - Moguillansky, Martin AU - Simari, Guillermo T2 - Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-09 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence PY - 2009 UR - https://ijcai.org/proceedings/2009/153 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents:
