Proceedings

Computational Complexity of Planning and Approximate Planning in Presence of Incompleteness

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Planning and Scheduling. Pages 948-954.

Abstract

In t he last several yea rs th e co mputational complexity of classical planning and HTN planning have b ee n s tudi ed . But in both cases it is assumed that the planner has complete knowledge about th e initial state. Recently, th ere has b ee n proposal to use 'sensing ' actions to plan in presence of incompleteness . In this paper we study the complexity of planning in such cases. In our study we use the action description language A proposed in 1993 by M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz and its extensions. The language A allows planning in the situations with complete information. It is known t h at, if we consider only plans of feasible (polynomial) length , the planning problem for such situations is NP-complete : even checking whether a given objective is attainable from a g iv en initi al state is NP- complete. In this paper, we show that th e planning problem in presen ce of incompleteness is indeed hard er : it belongs to the next level of complexity hierarchy (in precise terms, it is I:2P-complete) . To overcome th e complexity of this problem, C. Baral and T . Son have proposed several approximations. We show that under certain conditions, one of th ese approximations - 0-approximation - mak es the problem NP- complete (thus indeed redu cing its complexity).

Chitta Baral, Vladik Kreinovich, and Raul Trejo. 1999. Computational Complexity of Planning and Approximate Planning in Presence of Incompleteness. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-99. IJCAI, 948–954. https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1999/135
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards