Proceedings

Asymmetry Thesis and Side-Effect Problems in Linear-Time and Branching-Time Intention Logics

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Knowledge Representation. Pages 498-504.

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the relationships _between beliefs, goals, and intentions. In particular, we consider the formalization of the Asymmetry Thesis as proposed by Bratman [1987]. We argue that the semantic characteri~ation ?f this principle determines if the resultmg logtc is capable of handling other important problems such as the side-effect problem of beliefgoal~intention interaction. While Cohen and Levesque's [1990] formalization faithfully models some aspects of the asymmetry thesis, it does not solve all the side-effect problems; on the other hand the formalization provided by Rao and Georgeff [1991] solves all the side-effect problems, but only models a weak form of ~he asymmetry thesis. In this paper, we combme the intuition behind both these approaches and provide a semantic account of the asymmetry thesis, in both linear-time and branching-time logics, for solving many of these problems.

Anand S. Rao, and Michael P. Georgeff. 1991. Asymmetry Thesis and Side-Effect Problems in Linear-Time and Branching-Time Intention Logics. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-91. IJCAI, 498–504. https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1991/75
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards