A Correct Non-Monotonic ATMS
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Commonsense Reasoning. Pages 1049-1053.
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate technical methods to deal with exceptions. inconsistencies. and ambiguity. Existing reason maintenance systems are only suitable for some of these problems. Doyle's T M S handles exceptions properly, but gets in trouble with non-monotonic odd or even loops. On the other hand, de Kleer's ATMS produces too many contexts if there are exceptions of exceptions. Therefore, we present a hybrid reason maintenance system that benefits from the advantages of the ATMS and TMS. First of all, we use Reiter's default logic as a specification for this system. Second, we develop a criterion that decides which assumption sets are valid. Then, we extend the ATMS by a test algorithm that takes account of exceptions and obeys this criterion. We verify the resulting system using default logic. Finally, we discuss some problems involved with special techniques for resolving inconsistencies (e.g. TMSlike backtracking).
@inproceedings{ijcai1989p168,
title = {A Correct Non-Monotonic ATMS},
author = {Junker, Ulrich},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-89}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence},
editor = {N. S. Sridharan},
pages = {1049--1053},
year = {1989},
month = {8},
note = {Commonsense Reasoning},
url = {https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1989/168},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - A Correct Non-Monotonic ATMS AU - Junker, Ulrich T2 - Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-89 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence PY - 1989 SP - 1049 EP - 1053 UR - https://ijcai.org/proceedings/1989/168 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents: